My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/27/2003 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2003
>
01/27/2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2014 12:58:38 PM
Creation date
7/10/2014 11:46:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
01/27/2003
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />• No fill from the proposed project is required. <br />• No impact to the wetland. <br />City Engineer Jim Studenski has reviewed the site and is recommending vacation of the <br />area noted on the attached survey, based on the fact that elevations are above the 902 -foot <br />elevation threshold, and thus out of the 100 -year flood elevation, and that the vacation <br />has Rice Creek Watershed District approval. <br />CONCLUSION <br />Although it is unclear when and why the approved grading plan for the subject lot was <br />altered, what is clear is the fact that there are areas within the established easement area <br />that are above the 902 -foot elevation which defines the 100 -year flood plain elevation. <br />As a result, City staff is recommending the vacation of 295 sq.ft. portion of the easement <br />area, with the condition noted below, in order that Mr. Vancil may construct an addition <br />onto his home. Rice Creek Watershed has also reviewed and approved this vacation. <br />1.) All portions of the lot outside of the drainage and utility easement which are below <br />the 902 -foot threshold elevation must be filled so that an elevation at or above 902 is <br />achieved. A building permit will not be issued until the City Engineer is satisfied that <br />this condition has been met. <br />OPTIONS <br />1.) Approve the proposed Vacation. <br />2.) Deny the proposed Vacation. <br />3.) Return to staff with direction. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Option #1 <br />Item 7C 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.