Laserfiche WebLink
Centennial Fire District <br />7741 Lake Drive <br />Lino Lakes MN 55014. <br />During the first part of 2003, a new Building Code and Fire Code will <br />be adopted by the State of Minnesota. At that time the cities will also be <br />adopting the same codes. There are some optional amendments that can be <br />adopted with the Building Code. One of the options is numbered 1306 which <br />sets up additional fire sprinkler requirements. This amendment will have to <br />adopted with the Building Code. <br />The three cities that make up the Centennial Fire District have all <br />adopted the 1306 amendment to the Building Code in the past. This <br />amendment provides for automatic fire sprinklers in more buildings than the <br />standard Building Code does. The 1306 amendment also requires that <br />existing buildings be sprinlded whenever an addition is made to the building <br />that triggers a sprinkler system. <br />The Joint Powers Agreement that created the Centennial Fire District <br />requires that each of the member cities adopt the 1306 amendment in order <br />to provide a higher degree of life safety in our buildings and to hold fire <br />protection costs down in the future. However there are some options within <br />the 1306 amendment that are the city's choice. <br />The first option is weather or not the existing building gets sprinkled <br />when an addition is made. The 1306 amendment that we presently have <br />requires the existing building to be sprinlded when an addition is made. The <br />Centennial Fire District would like to keep this option as it has worked well <br />for us in the past. <br />The second option has to do with apartments and townhomes. One <br />choice is to sprinkle them when they are 3 or more stories in height or when <br />there are 16 units or more. The other choice is to require sprinkler system <br />whenever they are 3 or more stories in height or when the total building is <br />more than 8,500 sq. ft. in size. The Centennial Fire District would prefer to <br />have the more stringent option because we feel there would be substantially <br />less damage in case of a fire in one of these units. When there is a fire in a <br />Page '1 of 2 12/18/2002 <br />