My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/25/2003 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2003
>
08/25/2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2014 5:17:51 PM
Creation date
7/14/2014 11:27:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/25/2003
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Aqua Lane Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br />page 3 <br />Until the City receives a site development application in the future, there is no way to <br />know what site layout or actual density is possible under current regulations. A concept <br />plan shows 38 units planned for the four -acre site, which would be 9.5 units per acre. <br />This may or may not be realistic. <br />Other aspects of site design also will be examined upon reception of a site plan <br />application. (For example, the existing private drive serving units north of the site <br />appears to be centered on the property line.) <br />Any application that involves platting, variances, or conditional use permits will require <br />public review. Subdividing the land for buildings on individual lots would require a plat. <br />Building more than one principal building on one lot requires a planned unit <br />development, which would require a conditional use permit under the new ordinance. <br />Therefore, either of these options will require a public hearing. <br />Approval of the comprehensive plan amendment in no way gives any explicit or implicit <br />approval of any site plan or development application. Development of the site will <br />require application for the approval of such things as a plat, site plan and building plan, <br />conditional use permit, and any other approval that applies. <br />Submittal to Metropolitan Council <br />Under state law, a comprehensive plan amendment requires submittal to the Metropolitan <br />Council. The City approval of the amendment will be contingent upon Met Council <br />approval. <br />PLANNING & ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDATION <br />The P & Z recommended denial of the application. The reasoning is that the Medium <br />Density classification allows up to six units per acre. If the four -acre site is developed at <br />six units per acre, it will be very close to the existing development: the adjacent Marshan <br />Condominium townhomes were built at 6.4 u/a. <br />SUMMARY <br />Staff recognizes the P & Z Board's recommendation. However, the inconsistency <br />between the current zoning and the land use classification should be resolved. In <br />summary, the salient facts are: <br />• The existing adjacent development of 134 condominium/townhome units was built at <br />6.4 units per acre: a density that falls in the High Density category. However, the <br />comprehensive plan guides it Medium Density. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.