My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/08/2000 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2000
>
03/08/2000 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2014 12:57:57 PM
Creation date
7/15/2014 10:19:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
03/08/2000
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />March 8, 2000 <br />Page 5 <br />Mr. VonBische explained that he believed the City had five choices. The first choice <br />would be to approve the plat and get an extension when the Church makes a decision. <br />The second choice would be to approve the plat and the City could use it's power of <br />eminent domain to acquire the Church property. The third choice would be to approve <br />the plat with an alternate entrance. The fourth choice would be a denial of the plat. The <br />fifth choice would be to table the item and continue negotiations. He explained that he <br />just wanted fairness as he has done everything he can do within reason to meet the <br />requirements of the plat. The burden now was with the City to determine if a road is <br />really worth it. <br />Chair Schaps responded by telling Mr. VonBische that it sounded like he was asking the <br />City to do what he is supposed to do as a developer, and that it was easy for Mr. <br />VonBische to tell the City to use the power of eminent domain to acquire Church <br />property. The City has told Mr. VonBische exactly what it needs, but Mr. VonBische <br />cannot get the deal done. <br />Mr. VonBische said the City would be denying a lando to access a County <br />road, and the right to develop his property. He note • � get the road in the <br />future if it wants, it just needs to plan for it. He sai 'e A ing to build the road and <br />pay for it. If the Church does not want to mak. • 1, t 't is the way it is, and the City <br />should use the power of eminent domain to property. <br />Chair Schaps reiterated it is not the C 's t to , what the developer cannot do. He <br />suggested that Mr. VonBische do . • get the deal done as it is his business. <br />The City's job is to make sure t • •p t meets all of the ordinances. He <br />commented the City has bee g s this item for six months now and the project <br />has gone nowhere, even t .0 a g e minor changes have been made. <br />Mr. Corson stated he c • " mpathize with the developer, but agreed that it is not in the <br />City's interest to urch property. He asked if Bluebill Lane was considered as <br />an alternate for a •, s, rsection. <br />Mr. Powell responde and said Bluebill Lane is not a four -way intersection, and the <br />median will make it a right -in, right -out. The rationale for not considering it as an <br />alternate for a major intersection is the spacing between 4th Avenue and Lake Drive and <br />that Wood Duck Trail serves a larger area. <br />Mr. Corson questioned why a Wood Duck Trail shift would not work. <br />Mr. Powell stated Wood Duck Trail is a future signalized intersection, and a shift in the <br />south leg would not work. <br />Mr. Corson stated his agreement with Chair Schaps , and said it was not in the City's best <br />• interest to condemn Church property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.