My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/12/2000 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2000
>
04/12/2000 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2014 12:57:17 PM
Creation date
7/15/2014 10:23:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
04/12/2000
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />April 12, 2000 <br />Page 2 <br />Mr. Johnson moved to close open mike at 6:36 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Schilling. <br />Motion carried 6 -0. <br />V. ACTION ITEMS <br />A. David Pearson, 6280 Ware Road, Variance <br />Chair Schaps declared the public hearing open at 6:37 p.m. <br />Staff advised that the applicant, David Pearson, has submitted an application for a <br />variance to allow a single family home at 6280 Ware Road to be located closer than the <br />required 40 feet from the property line on a collector roadway. The Ordinance requires a <br />minimum setback of 40 feet. The applicant has redesigned the proposed dwelling to <br />minimize the setback required which will be 30 feet at the north/west corner and 37.6 at <br />the south/west corner. The variance requested ranges from 2 <br />only vacant lot in the area and contains wetlands which res <br />grade on the easterly side. <br />o ten feet. This is the <br />as well as the steep <br />Staff noted the criteria required for variance consid <br />fact. Staff advised this development has coven <br />value range and the applicant maintains the <br />but would not meet that value criteria if t <br />of the variance as requested. <br />ecommended findings of <br />'eh quire all homes within a <br />e meets that value as proposed <br />educed. Staff recommends approval <br />Chair Schaps asked if comment w�� °cep <' d from neighboring property owners. Ms. <br />Wyland stated notices were o • surrounding property owners. The <br />Metropolitan Council owt. R to the north and a single family residence is on the <br />east side of the wetlan <br />Mr. Johnson sug <br />site. He stated he <br />need for care and to <br />are be given to grading plans to assure a sufficient building <br />what occurred on this site. Ms. Wyland concurred with the <br />e a closer look at that aspect. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked about the actual elevations of the site. He noted it appears the garage <br />entrance is from the Coyote Trail side. Ms. Wyland stated that is correct and noted the <br />grading plan which indicates the elevations of the site. <br />Mr. Rafferty inquired regarding the mention of a setback of 7.5 feet from the back of the <br />house. Ms. Wyland stated that measures the distance from the drainage easement, there is <br />no required setback.. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked if this particular plan had been before the Planning and Zoning Board <br />previously. Ms. Wyland stated it has not been. <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.