Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />July 12, 2000 <br />Page 6 <br />Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to continue the public hearing to the August 9, 2000 <br />Planning & Zoning Board meeting, and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 7- <br />0. <br />E. PUBLIC HEARING, (Continuation) Ordinance 09 -00, Tree Preservation <br />Ordinance <br />Staff noted that at the June 14 meeting, the P & Z opened and continued the public <br />hearing on the new tree preservation ordinance. The hearing was continued for two <br />reasons: 1) There was some concern about requirements for residents building on <br />individual single family lots; and, 2) It was hoped to receive additional input from <br />developers. <br />Staff indicated that rather than rewriting the draft ordinance, they decided to ask the <br />City's environmental specialist, Marty Aslesen, to attend the P meeting to explain <br />how they currently addresses tree preservation on single fa �_ o' The requirements in <br />the draft ordinance reflect current practice. Specifically .1. on page 4, and <br />IV.A. on page 5, and 1V.B.3. apply to single family h• . di 'sue° ots. <br />It was noted staff had received one additional <br />Heritage Development. The P & Z discussed <br />June meeting. The Environmental Board <br />requirements twice. Staff advised that th <br />additional information is needed. T <br />by the City Council. <br />ents from a developer, <br />m arlson & Associates at the <br />t "' ew tree preservation <br />close the hearing or continue it if <br />ill require a first and second reading <br />Chair Schaps excused hims eeting at 7:45 p.m. Vice Chair Lane chaired the <br />remainder of the meetin <br />Mr. Aslesen reviewed tory with tree preservation and importance to educate <br />residents and buil t egard. <br />Mr. Rafferty comm ed on the importance of assuring tree preservation actually occurs. <br />He suggested that th ouse should be located in consideration of tree location and in <br />such a way to save all trees possible. He stated he appreciates Mr. Aslesen's work. <br />Mr. Johnson commented on the importance of open communication between the <br />developer/builder and City staff to assure significant trees are identified and it can be <br />determined which trees are worth saving and which are not due to storm damage, disease, <br />etc. <br />Mr. Corson stated he believes all in Lino Lakes appreciate the need to preserve trees. <br />However, he would like it simply defined which trees are significant and should be saved, <br />or to assure an ordinance such as being considered is correctly written. He noted the <br />indication that certain trees are not considered desirable and cannot be used as <br />replacement. <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />