My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/13/2000 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2000
>
09/13/2000 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2014 12:09:44 PM
Creation date
7/15/2014 10:43:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
09/13/2000
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />September 13, 2000 <br />Page 2 <br />V. ACTION ITEMS <br />A. Mark Pariseau, 6101 Centerville Road, Variance <br />Staff presented the application by Mark Pariseau requesting a variance to construct a 24 <br />foot by 24 foot detached garage 21.5 feet from the front property line, 2.5 feet behind the <br />existing home. The property is zoned Rural and located on a collector roadway requiring <br />a front setback of 40 feet. The lot is considered to be a pre- existing non - conforming lot <br />of record due to the front setback and the lot size which is approximately 150 feet by 227 <br />feet (10 -acre minimum required). <br />Staff noted the four other properties west of this site that are also less than ten acres in <br />size with varied front setbacks. Staff presented the findings of fact which must be met <br />when considering a request for a variance and noted there are some hardships involved in <br />this case as the applicant has a mound type septic system behi home with a slight <br />drainage swale in front of the system. Locating the garage to the setback <br />requirement may hamper this drainage swale and place o close to the septic <br />system. Staff has received a letter from the adjoinin er indicating no <br />objection to the variance requested. <br />In review of this request, staff suggested loc � posed garage five feet from the <br />storage shed, thus maintaining a setback t from the front property line. This <br />would require approval of a variance f eet': •m the 35 -foot distance established by <br />Section 3, Subd. 3.d.2.a. The gara cated approximately 21 feet behind the <br />front of the home allowing additio space in front of the garage. Staff <br />explained it is recommendin v ��� ith three revised conditions to assure the staff <br />has an opportunity to verify ` . surements and setback distance. <br />Upon inquiry, Mr. Sm <br />the house. He ex <br />so it is important t <br />applicant at the site <br />`ted s aff wants to assure the garage is not located in front of <br />with a variance, it is recorded with the title of the property <br />actly where the line is. If approved, staff will meet the <br />take the measurement. <br />Chair Schaps asked the applicant if he would like to make comment. <br />Mose Pariseau, father of the applicant, stated he staked out the garage as proposed but <br />found they have a major problem with drainage between the back of the garage and <br />mound system which needs to be addressed. He advised that some of the drainage is <br />from Centerville Road during heavy rains so the farther they can get from that drainage <br />area, the better it will be. Mr. Pariseau stated he believes the best situation is to align the <br />back of the garage with the back of the house, but that would require a 13.5 foot variance <br />for that location. <br />• Chair Schaps commented on the large amount of work that has occurred on this property. <br />Mr. Pariseau explained his son bought this property as a disaster house and to fix it up. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.