09/13/2000 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning & Zoning Board September 13, 2000 Page 4 • Mark Pariseau corrected that it is 20 feet to the property line but 47 feet of driveway from the garage to the edge of the roadway. Mr. Corson inquired regarding the potential for future County roadway improvements. Mr. Smyser stated the County does anticipate, at some time in the future, that some sort of improvement will occur. At that time, if the roadway is realigned, the County may need to take the house or obtain an easement from Mr. Pariseau. Mose Pariseau stated he had Roger Butler of Anoka County visit the property and talked with him about the culvert and problem with semi trucks making the turn at the front of the house. Mr. Butler had indicated they had to stay within their property and would not round off the curve to make it an easier turning movement. Mr. Butler also indicated they may consider taking land to the south, if needed, so the houses would not be impacted. Mark Pariseau stated if the County ever decides to "square" t er, it would push the intersection away from this property and provide more setb ss setback. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approve a variance t. • , 24 foot by 24 foot detached garage at 6101 Centerville Road with the to $ & •editions: 1. Locate the proposed garage 30 feet fro 2. Proper building permits are obtained The motion was supported by Mr. perty line. nstruction. ion carried 6 -0. B. PUBLIC HEARIN ; ti to October 11, 2000) Oasis Market, 7509 Lake Drive, Amended C in s ffi 1 Use Permit This agenda item was d from the agenda upon adoption. Chair Schaps noteaR,, would be on the October 11, 2000 meeting agenda. C. PUBLIC HE RING, Central Suburban Inc., 416 Lilac Street, Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review Chair Schaps declared the public hearing opened at 7:04 p.m. Staff presented the application by Central Suburban, Inc. for a Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to build an addition on the existing building and use the site for its land development and construction business. Staff explained the CUP will cover both the building expansion and an amendment to the grandfathered outdoor storage CUP. Thus, two sets of findings must be made. Staff reviewed its analysis of the application and presented the findings required for consideration of a CUP and findings specific to outdoor storage. Staff finds that the general and specific findings apply and recommends approval of the site plan and CUP to expand the pole building and outdoor storage based on the listed findings and subject to 13 conditions plus added conditions to require the