09/13/2000 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning & Zoning Board September 13, 2000 Page 7 Chair Schaps asked Mr. Robinson to send the Board's best wishes to his father who served the City for years on the Planning & Zoning Board. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approve the request of Deer Meadows Golf Range for site and building plan review for a small addition to the existing building at the Deer Meadows Golf Range based on the findings in staff's report, with the following conditions: 1. Approval of the site plan and conditional use permit is not an implied approval of signage. Any signs require a sign permit and must comply with the sign ordinance. 2. No additional exterior lighting shall be installed. 3. Proper building permits must be obtained prior to any construction and 1% of the construction costs must be put in escrow to insure completion of all site improvements. The motion was supported by Mr. Johnson. Motion c E. City of Lino Lakes, Otter Lake Road, Mi or ° �, Sion Staff explained the City has purchased land Clearwater Creek light industrial area. T via a minor subdivision. Staff advised not just an easement. Since this is claim to a buildable lot on either s Mr. Johnson noted a discre remembers it was to be correct road name and roadway is being ..te accommodate ne d wetland mitigation in the ust be divided from the larger parcel power line strip is a parcel in itself, for ponding, there is no danger of a SP land. Staff recommends approval. the maps regarding the road name. He stated that he crest. Mr. Smyser agreed there is confusion about the able to answer that question. However, one section of the art of this process in cooperation with the City of Hugo to ent in Hugo. Mr. Johnson made a < OTION to approve the request of the City of Lino Lakes for a minor subdivision in the Clearwater Creek light industrial area to facilitate ponding and wetland mitigation, and was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion carried 6 -0. F. PUBLIC HEARING (Continuation), Ordinance 09 -00, Tree Preservation Ordinance Chair Schaps declared the public hearing reopened at 7:29 p.m. Staff explained the public hearing had been continued from the last meeting to allow staff to analyze a sample development project using the draft tree ordinance and to address the requirements for individual home builders. Staff asked the Board to consider and discuss the issues raised in its staff report and provide direction for revising the draft ordinance. Mr. Smyser stated he did not find this scenario to be what staff would consider a "typical" development but maybe one -fifth of the developments submitted may have heavier than