Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />January 10, 2001 <br />Page 16 <br />Drive. However, the plan would require tearing up both roads to provide connection to <br />utilities, which was an undesirable approach. It was noted five lots along 12th Avenue <br />would require separate driveway accesses, which was also undesirable from a safety <br />standpoint. He stated the plan in the packet presented to the Board was undergoing <br />change because staff was not comfortable with what was originally presented. <br />Chair Schaps left the meeting at 9:24 p.m. <br />Mr. Powell stated they took a strong position of the driveways fronting 12th Avenue. <br />There were also utility concerns because the roadways would need to be torn up. They <br />strongly recommended them fronting the driveways along the cul -de -sac. Mr. Smyser <br />stated it was possible there might be a lot depth variance in exchange for keeping the <br />driveways off 12th Avenue. This was something that would be a good compromise. He <br />stated the first concept would have needed many variances, so they asked the developer to <br />rework this concept. <br />Mr. Corson asked about the water drainage and how wet the ditches were in the area. Mr. <br />Powell replied there was a culvert that crossed underneath and took most of the water. <br />Chair Schaps returned to the meeting at 9:31 p.m. <br />Mr. Lyden asked about the PDO and what was the stance on that. Mr. Smyser replied it <br />was not clear to them as to what was required. He stated those where a number of the <br />issues conveyed to the developer and since then the developer had been adjusting the <br />layouts. He stated this was all they had at the time. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked what the solution would be for the park. He asked if this would still <br />be the Birch area. Mr. Smyser replied there was nothing on this site that would work for <br />parkland and Park Board indicated this would be a cash development. <br />C. Dellwood LLC <br />Mr. Smyser stated they were still talking with them and were expecting a packet possibly <br />next week. So far discussions had been largely positive. However, there had been some <br />concerns with the Environmental Board. <br />D. February, 2001 Meeting date <br />The Board decided to move the February 14, 2001 meeting date to February 13, 2001 due <br />to Valentines Day. <br />E. EIFS Update <br />Mr. Lyden stated he had recently received information regarding EIFS. He indicated he <br />would make a copy of this information and would like to discuss this in the future. <br />VII. ADJOURNMENT <br />