Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />February 13, 2001 <br />Page 6 <br />put their store on. However, she was concerned about the access off of 77th Street to the <br />Target Store. She stated Target Corporation had indicated the City wanted the access. <br />She indicated she did not want access off of 77th Street into Target. Mr. Powell <br />responded the City wanted some sort of a connection from 77th Street to Target Store; not <br />from Target Store to 77th Street. He stated they originally had discussions for an access <br />for emergency vehicles only, not for traffic to go from Apollo Drive to 77th Street. He <br />stated the way the development was proposed, they were looking at Target Corporation's <br />proposal for another access, but the Target Corporation was still revising their plans and <br />nothing had been decided on. <br />Mr. Corson made a MOTION to continue the public hearing until such time as the EAW <br />process was completed and wetland fill and mitigation plans were approved by Rice <br />Creek, and was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion carried 5 -0. <br />C. PUBLIC HEARING, Land Holding Group, 12th & Holly, Preliminary Plat <br />Chair Schaps declared the public hearing opened at 7:14 p.m. <br />Staff presented the application by Land Hold Group for a preliminary plat for the <br />northwest corner of 12th Avenue and Holly Drive. <br />Staff presented its analysis of the request, noting the site was zoned for residential <br />development. The site was within the existing MUSA, and all of the lots met or exceeded <br />the minimum lot size. The proposed lot widths were compliant with the minimum <br />standard of a width of 90 feet for interior lots and 115 feet for corner lots. The minimum <br />lot depth was 135 feet. All of the lots, except Lot 8, complied with this standard. Lot 8 <br />had a depth of 127 feet, which required a variance. The Planning Commission could <br />consider the site was impacted by wetlands and it was located at the intersection of two <br />collector roads thereby limiting design options as a basis for granting the variance. Staff <br />stated applicant had not submitted information about what house styles were being <br />considered. The grading of the site must accommodate the housing styles. Staff <br />indicated an existing shed and pole building were located within the new street right -of- <br />way and must be removed. Utilities existed on both 12th and Holly, and an extension of <br />utilities down the proposed cul -de -sac was proposed. The water main needed to be <br />looped to 12th Street. The utilities plan was subject to City Engineer review and approval. <br />The number of lots fronting 12th Avenue had been reduced from five lots in the concept <br />plan to one lot in the preliminary plat. The number of lots fronting on Holly Drive had <br />increased from zero to one. The rest of the lots were proposed to front a new cul -de -sac <br />street. Based on modifications to the plan, which reduced the number of accesses, staff <br />approved the layout. <br />Staff indicated a trail was envisioned along Holly Drive, but had not been designed yet. It <br />had not been decided whether the trail would be on the north or south side of Holly. It <br />would be within the road right -of -way. Park dedication for this new development would <br />be cash. Although boundaries of wetlands were shown on the preliminary plat, a wetland <br />delineation report would need to be submitted. Wetland review should determine if the <br />filling of the created pond that was proposed to be built in the southwest portion of the <br />• <br />• <br />