Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />March 14, 2001 <br />Page 5 <br />Land Use and Zoning: The northern 20 acres (approximately) was zoned R -1. The <br />south 20 acres (approximately) was zoned rural. The application was to rezone the entire <br />parcel to R -1. Additionally, the applicant included a comprehensive plan amendment to <br />bring the entire property into the MUSA. The existing and proposed comprehensive plan <br />designated the northern portion of the parcel for low- density residential development. <br />While the entire parcel was proposed to be platted, the wetland portion of the property <br />was 15.34 acres so the area to be added to the MUSA did not have a net impact on the <br />amount of land to be serviced. Nonetheless, the MUSA line would have to be moved to <br />include the southern portion of the site in the MUSA. The amount of upland in the <br />southern portion was about eight acres, which would be the amount of MUSA reserved to <br />be allocated to the site. <br />Greenway: The draft Comprehensive Plan identifies areas for greenways. The intent of <br />the greenway designation was to protect environmentally sensitive areas. This would be <br />accomplished by overlaying a drainage and utility easement in the areas to be protected. <br />Additionally, staff recommended that wetland markers be placed along the perimeter of <br />the delineated wetlands to protect the space. <br />Lot Sizes and Layout: The R -1 District minimum lot size was 10,800 square feet of <br />upland. Lot 13, Block 1 did not meet this standard. All other lots met or exceeded this <br />provision. <br />The minimum lot width was 80 feet at the 30 -foot front yard setback. There were 11 lots <br />that did not meet this provision. <br />The minimum lot depth was 135 feet. All of the lots met or exceeded this provision. <br />Grading: Fill was proposed on the site to create the house pad areas and roadways. <br />Much of the site was proposed to remain undisturbed and would be encumbered by <br />drainage and utility easement. The grading plan was subject to the review and approval <br />of the City Engineer. <br />Existing Structures: All existing structures shall be removed from the site. <br />Transportation: Access to the property was proposed from Old Birch Street. This <br />required right -of -way acquisition from an adjacent parcel. A roadway connection is also <br />proposed to Killdeer Drive. This also required right -of -way acquisition from an adjacent <br />parcel. The adequacy of the access was subject to the review and approval of the City <br />Engineer. Acquisition of right -of -way was the responsibility of the applicant. <br />A feasibility study was underway which would include road access and impacts to the <br />Old Birch St. roadway. This study was scheduled to be received by the City Council on <br />March 12. <br />Utilities: A feasibility study has been completed which examines the best way to provide <br />utility services to the property. This study was received by the City Council on March <br />12. <br />