My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/09/2001 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2001
>
05/09/2001 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2014 11:57:32 AM
Creation date
7/15/2014 11:29:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
05/09/2001
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />May 9, 2001 <br />Page 14 <br />ordinance, the Council may "permit variations from the requirements in specific cases <br />which in its opinion, do not affect the general sense of this chapter." In this case, the <br />longer cul -de -sac allows the elimination of one cul -de -sac so it limits the overall number. <br />In addition, the existing development and the road connection to the east and the lake and <br />wetland areas on and surrounding the property limit the design possibilities. <br />Staff noted that Lots 5 -10, Block 2, have been modified so that all of the lots meet the <br />upland lot area requirement. With the revised design, all of the lots meet the ordinance <br />requirements for upland lot area and width. Lot 22, Block 1, does not meet the lot depth <br />requirement of 135 feet; all other lots meet the lot depth provision. <br />Mr. Powell stated he received an e -mail from Anoka County and found the road <br />configuraitons as propsoed are consistent with what has been discussed. <br />Ms. Sherman noted the addtional information that has been provided by the applicant and <br />commented on potential impact to utility layout. She advised that based upon the revised <br />plans and action by the Rice Creek Watershed District, staff recommends approval of the <br />application for preliminary plat subject to the six conditions detailed in the May 9, 2001 <br />staff report. <br />Chair Schaps asked about additional comments from the Environmental Board. Ms. <br />Sherman stated they want to assure the wetland boundary is protected and a homeowner's <br />association is formed to assure that protection. <br />Chair Schaps asked about the Park Board recommendation. Ms. Sherman stated they <br />recommend an all cash park dedication. <br />Mr. Corson asked about the continued trail along Birch Street. Mr. Powell stated he is <br />unsure whether the Park Board considered this since the revised plans were submitted by <br />the applicant on April 25th. <br />Mr. Rafferty stated he is pleased to see the direction toward single - family but finds it <br />difficult to believe the Park Board is recommending a cash donation for 50 homes. He <br />asked where the children from this neighborhood will play. <br />Chair Schaps invited the applicant to make comment. <br />Rockey Goertz, applicant, explained the site is surrounded by Anoka County parkland <br />which has adequate upland room for a trail. He estimated Anoka County has 25 acres <br />with a 20 foot to 100 foot strip of upland. Mr. Goertz stated he is open to dedicating a <br />portion of trail easement should it be needed. However, the Park Board recommended a <br />cash donation. <br />Chair Schaps asked how many park meetings he attended. Mr. Goertz stated he attended <br />no park meetings but has been in contact with staff. He stated it is his understanding that <br />the Birch Street trail was eliminated due to the high volume of traffic. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.