Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />June 13, 2001 <br />Page 18 <br />Staff indicated Outlots A and D were proposed to be dedicated as partial satisfaction of park land <br />requirements. Outlot A provided a desired trail corridor from Main Street to the neighborhood. <br />Connections to the park abutting the southwest corner of this parcel would be provided over the <br />local streets. Outlot D was land dedicated to add to the existing park. <br />Staff explained the amount of the land required to be dedicated was 10 percent of the gross area <br />of the plat or 3.37 acres. An additional amount of land must also be dedicated to offset the loss <br />of existing parkland caused by the extension of Arlo Lane to serve the plat. The area of Outlots <br />A and D were 0.72 acres, from which the replacement park land must be subtracted. The balance <br />of required park dedication would be required to be satisfied in the form of a cash fee in lieu of <br />land based upon the formula outlined in the Subdivision Ordinance. <br />Staff stated the preliminary plat included Outlots B and C, in addition to those being provided for <br />park dedication purposes. <br />Staff explained Outlot B was a parcel of land fronting Street A th <br />access to a land locked parcel to the south east. This land loc <br />have frontage to 79th Street via a reserve strip that was to be <br />need to follow up on resolution of this matter. <br />to provide <br />so intended to <br />e City. Staff would <br />Staff explained Outlot C was a 0.07 -acre parcel of land t <br />was being conveyed to the abutting property to <br />lot and the parkland. <br />s the expanded park. The Outlot <br />order to create a buffer between that <br />Staff stated water and sanitary sewer we d to be provided to serve the single - <br />family uses. Sanitary sewer and watx shown within the rights -of -way. Storm <br />sewer facilities were also shown o ' 1.` asements had been provided at the perimeter of <br />each lot and over all drainage fa All ity plans were subject to review and approval of <br />the City Engineer. <br />Staff stated comments from th nvironmental Board had not been received. <br />Chair Schaps asked if t i ehensive Plan had addressed this area with respect to parkland. <br />Mr. Brixius stated this "'''uld be an extension to the park area already in existence. <br />Mr. Lyden asked if it was too late to make this R -1X. Mr. Brixius stated there was no <br />application before them for R -1X zoning. <br />Chair Schaps invited applicant to make comment. <br />Ms. Gail Judd, 670 Arlen Lane, stated she was the person who Outlot C was being dedicated to. <br />She asked if this was on meeting in a series of meetings, or if this was being approved tonight. <br />Chair Schaps replied this would go to Council for their decision eventually. <br />Ms. Judd asked if Outlot D was parkland because they were purchasing Outlot C. She requested <br />it be residential. Mr. Smyser replied her purchasing Outlot C, did not have any effect on the <br />decision to make Outlot D a park. <br />