Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />June 13, 2001 <br />Page 2 <br />VI. ACTION ITEMS <br />A. Glenn Valentine, 64th Street and 20th Avenue, Variance <br />Staff presented the application by explaining applicant had applied for a variance from the <br />required setback from a collector road. The site lies between I -35E and 20th Avenue (Co. Rd. <br />54). Most of the site was wetland. Only a small portion of the site was upland: the area along <br />the 20th Avenue. Variances from required road setbacks would be needed if a house and <br />driveway were to be built. Some wetland fill would be required. <br />Staff presented its analysis of its request by explaining in the R -X Rural Executive zoning <br />district, the City's zoning ordinance required a 40' building setback from a collector road such as <br />20th Ave. This site had only a small area of upland. Some wetland fill would be required if a <br />home was to be built. The greater the road setback, the more wetland f : s. ld occur. The <br />request was to allow the structure to be 10 feet from the right of way Vii` 20`h g-nue. <br />Staff stated the driveway must be at least 30 feet from the inter <br />of the property (Sec. 3 Subd. 5.C.8.f of the zoning ordinanc <br />additional wetland fill for the driveway. Therefore, a vari .r'' e w <br />driveway as shown on the submitted survey was 10 fe rom he int <br />With respect to future right -of -way, staff explai <br />foresaw the need for an additional five feet of r <br />occurred, the garage and driveway would b on <br />undesirable situation, it was a trade -off <br />wetland. The City could not simply <br />Staff stated the site was located <br />Management Organization <br />WLAWMO was pending. <br />needed. The plan showed just <br />Increasing the road se <br />ed from the corner <br />is would require <br />d for this as well. The <br />section. <br />a County had informed the City that it <br />on each side of the road. If this <br />from the ROW. While this was an <br />oser to the road and filling more <br />erty owner from using the land. <br />e ju ''diction of the Vadnais Lake Area Watershed <br />Because of the wetland impact, a review by <br />f the house would determine the amount of wetland fill <br />er 1000 sf of fill, as noted on the attached VLAWMO notice. <br />increase the wetland fill. <br />The VLAWO staff reco endation was to approve the plan. <br />With respect to a septic system, staff explained any new home on well and septic must have an <br />alternate drain field site designated. This was to ensure that a new drain field could be <br />constructed if the first one failed. <br />Staff reviewed the five findings for variance, as stated in the zoning ordinance that the City shall <br />make in considering all requests for variance in taking subsequent action. <br />Staff pointed out that the site was extremely restricted because of the wetlands. Without <br />variance from setback requirements, the property could not be used. The physical circumstances <br />were not created by the landowner. The hardship was not due to economic considerations. No <br />special privilege was being granted. This type of hardship was the reason for the variance. <br />Staff recommended approval of both variances to allow structure to be 10 feet from the collector <br />road and approve variance to allow the driveway to be 10 feet from the intersection. <br />