06/13/2001 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning & Zoning Board June 13, 2001 Page 8 Mr. Powell stated at many times, the concrete curb was replaced in past developments once further development occurred. He stated the reason they required this was for a finished look. He recommended there be a concrete curb placed in the area. Mr. Smyser indicated the standard lighting was to require a photometric plan with a shoebox type fixture with lighting directed downward. Mr. Maier replied they had no problem with this requirement. Mr. Smyser stated the future development area could not remain dirt and weeds. With respect to the parking, the City had to plan for parking for the entire building. He stated this had to be handled now. The parking could not be addressed in the future. He stated the area used as storage needed to be included in the parking requirements at this time. However, the Board could recommend a variance from that. Mr. Maier stated if the trash could be relocated, they may have e spaces in the back. Mr. Smyser expressed concern about par in and out. He recommended the variance of the three stall more parking ith trucks coming Mr. Lyden asked for Mr. Brixius' recommendations. z Bri ius r ied the standard parking arrangement for professional offices, and staff realized so$h +fessional offices required more parking and some less. He stated granting a var ceuld not be detrimental to this site, but any change of occupancy would require them t th arking standards. He stated if parking needed to be accommodated into the futur - u at ld b . ccomplished because there was sufficient room for additional parking. Mr. Corson asked the storage be ses to the north. Mr. Brixius replied this had a very residential feel and with ad • i land aping, there would not be a problem with this Mr. Corson asked about t of t fi' pond. Mr. Powell replied when the pond was designed, it was desi ed for r for future accommodation. Ms. Lane made a MO pprove the site and building plans as outlined in staff's report for Lino Lakes Family Dent try, except item F would allow a variance to allow for 23 off street parking stalls as opposed `" 0 26 parking stalls, and was supported by Mr. Lyden. After further discussion regarding the parking requirements, Ms. Lane withdrew her motion and Mr. Lyden withdrew his second. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to approve the site and building plans as outlined in staff's report for Lino Lakes Family Dentistry subject to staff's recommendations with exception of item F which required 26 parking stalls, and was supported by Mr. Lyden. Motion carried 4 -0. Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION for a variance of 23 parking stalls instead of 26 parking stalls referred to in Item F of staff's report, and in the future, if there were any changes to the property, all City codes shall be applicable, and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 4 -0. • •