My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/11/2001 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2001
>
07/11/2001 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2014 11:50:38 AM
Creation date
7/15/2014 11:43:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
07/11/2001
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />July 11, 2001 <br />Page 26 <br />VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br />A. Recommendation from Environmental Board for Moratorium on New <br />Development <br />Ms. Grochala stated the Environmental Board requested, at its July 27, 2001 meeting, <br />that a recommendation to establish a moratorium (interim ordinance) on all residential <br />development and possibly all development for a period of one year be forwarded to the <br />Planning and Zoning Board. <br />Mr. Grochala stated in response to the recent approval of the Comprehensive Plan by the <br />City Council, the Environmental Board adopted a recommendation to allow time for the <br />development of official controls to implement the goals and policies of the plan. <br />Mr. Grochala stated staff was not recommending the adoption of such an ordinance at <br />this time. He felt while an interim ordinance is an effective tool granted to municipalities <br />for the purpose of protecting the planning process, the implications of such an ordinance <br />needed to be fully identified. He indicated an all- encompassing prohibition of <br />development, as proposed, could generate many unintended consequences. <br />Mr. Grochala indicated several steps should ' ' consideration " an <br />interim ordinance, which included: <br />a. Metropolitan Council review and approval of the Comprehensive Plan. <br />b. Identification of "official control" modifications and timeline for <br />development of such. , <br />c. Inventory of existing/proposed development and available MUSA. <br />d. Identification of the potential impact on Economic Development activities. <br />Mr. Grochala indicated by addressing the, above items, the City would be able to better <br />ascertain the need for an interim" orinance and, if warranted, the appropriate scope it <br />should have. <br />Mr. Lyden asked staff if, given the late hour, it would be appropriate to discuss this item <br />at the next Planning and Zoning Board meeting. Mr. Grochala stated this item could be <br />continued to next month's Board meeting. <br />Mr. Lyden asked how soon staff anticipated approval of the Comprehensive Plan by the <br />Metropolitan Council. Mr. Brixious stated, proving the application for approval is <br />complete zthe Metropolitan Council is allowed a 90 day review period prior to making a <br />decision. Y: <br />Mr. Lyden made a MOTION to table consideration of the recommendation of the <br />Environmental Board to establish a moratorium (interim ordinance) on all residential <br />development and possibly all development for a period of one year to the August 2001 <br />Planning and Zoning Board meeting, and was supported by Mr. Zych. Motion carried 5- <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.