Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />August 8, 2001 <br />Page 7 <br />• Mr. Lyden made a MOTION to deny the variance to put a six -foot fence in the rear yard within <br />the set -back, and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 6 -0. <br />• <br />• <br />Mr. Rafferty expressed concern that the recommendations were not clear and the costs had not <br />been verified. <br />Mr. Lyden made a MOTION that the pool be moved and the City pay the reasonable cost of <br />moving the pool, and was supported by Mr. Corson. <br />Ms. Lane stated she would not support this if the pool was only moved a short distance. Mr. <br />Zych agreed and stated the pool should not be visible from the street and not be located in the <br />neighbor's front yard. <br />Chair Schaps asked that in the future, applicants be made aware of the City Ordinances, so errors <br />are not made like this again. Mr. Ramsay asked what the permit fee was for, if the applicant had <br />to investigate the Ordinances themselves. <br />Chair Schaps stated the fee was simply an administrative fee. <br />Mr. Corson stated the City might want to consider putting a pamphlet together to hand out with <br />permits outlining the Ordinances. Mr. Lyden suggested a pool safety article be placed in a <br />newsletter distributed to the citizens. <br />The Motion made by Mr. Lyden and seconded by Mr. Corson above was withdrawn and the <br />following recommendation was made: The pool be moved and the City pay the reasonable and <br />verifiable cost of moving the pool, with the pool preferably be moved to the farthest corner of the <br />lot. <br />VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br />A. September Meeting Date Change <br />Staff stated the date of the September Planning and Zoning Board Meeting had been changed <br />from Wednesday, September 12 to Tuesday, September 11, 2001 due to various staff members <br />attending annual conferences that week and their unavailability to attend a September 12, 2001 <br />meeting. The meeting date change would be posted on the front door of City Hall, in the Quad <br />Community Press, and on local government cable channel 16. <br />B. Recommendation from Environmental Board for moratorium on new development <br />Staff presented the Lino Lakes Environmental Board's recommendation to establish a <br />moratorium (interim ordinance) on all residential development and possibly all development for <br />a period of one year. This was in response to the recent approval of the Comprehensive Plan by <br />the City Council. The Environmental Board adopted the recommendation to allow time for the <br />development of official controls to implement the goals and policies of the plan. <br />Staff indicated they were not recommending the adoption of such an Ordinance at this time. <br />While an interim Ordinance was an effective tool granted to municipalities for the purpose of <br />protecting the planning process, the implications of such an Ordinance would need to be fully <br />