Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />September 11, 2001 <br />Page 21 <br />Ms. Lane returned to the meeting at 9:19 p.m. <br />Mr. Christensen stated the starting and ending times would be different for the two schools and <br />therefore, the younger students would not be exposed to the older students. Also, the elementary <br />students when outside, were always with school teachers or other staff. <br />Mr. Corson made a MOTION to close the Public Hearing at 9:20 p.m. and was supported by Mr. <br />Rafferty. Motion carried 5 -0. <br />Ms. Lane made a MOTION to approve the site and building plan to allow the construction of an <br />elementary school in a PSP, Public /Semi- Public zoning District as outlined in staff's report and <br />subject to staff's recommendations, and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 5 -0. <br />Ms. Lane made a MOTION to approve the Conditional Use Permit <br />outlined in staff's report and subject to staff's recommendations <br />recommended as a grassy area, and was supported by Mr. Raf <br />request as <br />d be <br />'ed 5 -0. <br />E. PUBLIC HEARING - Heritage Development, Sa <br />Chair Schaps opened the public hearing at 9:25 p.m. <br />Staff presented the application by explaining th <br />preliminary plat for property commonly <br />considered an application on the site th <br />rezoning for a portion of the propert <br />was not proposed for developme <br />The property was located so <br />received by the City on A , 200 <br />reliminary Plat <br />t had submitted an application for <br />dle Club. The City previously <br />mprehensive plan amendment and <br />ow proposed to be platted as an outlot and <br />o Old Birch Street. The review was based on plans <br />Staff presented its ana g the : "` quest by explaining the northern 20 acres (approximately) <br />was zoned R -1. The so • res (approximately) was zoned rural. The 28 building sites were <br />all located within the Si le Family Land Use District and the R -1 zoning district. <br />Staff explained the draft Comprehensive Plan identified areas for greenways. The intent of the <br />greenway designation was to protect environmentally sensitive areas. This was previously part of <br />the original application for this area. However, because the area outside of the current MUSA <br />was not being platted for development at this time the greenway area are not specifically <br />addressed but could be required in the future. <br />Staff stated the R -1 District minimum lot size was 10,800 square feet of upland. All lots met or <br />exceed this provision with an average lot size of 17,551.4 square feet of upland. <br />• Staff indicated the minimum lot width was 80 feet at the 30 -foot front yard setback. All lots met <br />this requirement. The minimum lot depth was 135 feet. All of the lots met or exceed this <br />provision. <br />