My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/11/2001 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2001
>
09/11/2001 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2014 11:47:36 AM
Creation date
7/15/2014 11:49:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
09/11/2001
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />September 11, 2001 <br />Page 4 <br />Ms. Lane asked if the shed were removed, what size structure would Mr. Poser be allowed to <br />have. Ms. Gretz replied he could build a 460 square foot building. <br />Mr. Hyden asked about the driveway access off of 62nd. He asked if this would be a problem. <br />Mr. Powell replied the driveway construction would go over an easement and they would need to <br />receive permission to go over the easement, but this was not unusual and this was done all of the <br />time. <br />Mr. Corson asked if there was any problem with having two driveways. Mr. Powell replied the <br />Ordinances did not prohibit it, but he strongly advised against it. <br />Ms. Lane stated she was in agreement with Mr. Zych for allowing this variance, but only if the <br />smaller shed would be removed. <br />Ms. Lane made a MOTION to allow the variance on the conditio a accessory <br />building of 160 feet be removed, and the driveway be moved fee rt . st, and was <br />supported by Mr. Zych. <br />After further discussion, Ms. Lane withdrew her moti <br />Ms. Lane made a MOTION to deny the varianc <br />maximum number allowed, and was supported <br />Ms. Lane made a MOTION to approve <br />placed in compliance 20 feet east and <br />that Mr. Poser was extremely clo <br />adjoining landowners, and was <br />Mr. Corson stated staff mi <br />r. Zyrtfi withdrew his second. <br />an accessory building in excess of <br />h. Motion carried 5 -0. <br />, contingent with the driveway being <br />essory building be removed, for the reason <br />e Ordinance, and he had the permission of the <br />d by `1 r. Zych. <br />to ange this Ordinance. <br />Chair Schaps clarified " at y were allowing was one accessory building and the shed <br />would need to be remo <br />Motion carried (4 -1 Corson). <br />B. Rick Piper, 6153 Oakwood Drive, Variance <br />Staff presented the application by explaining applicant had applied for a variance from the <br />required 5 -foot side yard setback for accessory buildings in order to construct a 465 square foot <br />addition on to his existing 624 square foot attached garage. The proposed addition would be <br />used primarily to house a third car, and secondarily for storage. In addition, applicant argued <br />that several homes in the neighborhood had three -stall garages, and that such an addition would <br />add value and marketability to the subject property. <br />Staff presented its analysis of the request by explaining applicant wanted to build a 31' X 15' <br />addition onto his existing attached garage. The current garage was located in the northeast <br />corner of the lot, 15 feet from the northern property line. Staff stated a water well was located in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.