Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />October 10, 2001 <br />Page 5 <br />Mr. Smyser indicated on the landscaping plan where the berm and plantings were. He <br />stated the berm was 110 feet from the property line to where the berm began. The berm <br />is 40' wide, which adds up to a 150' setback area. <br />Mr. Lyden expressed concern about the landscaping and the runway. Mr. Smyser replied <br />this situation would not have been allowed if the airport overlay were enforced. But this <br />was a situation where they were dealing with everything the best they could. <br />Chair Schaps invited the applicant to make comment. <br />Randy Molin, applicant, stated with respect for the irrigation on the berm, the <br />landscaping would be monitored and maintained for the first couple of years by a <br />landscaping company. After that time, Molin Concrete would maintain the landscaping <br />themselves. <br />Douglas Miller, 7780 Lois Lane, believed the landscapin_.� as te. He asked that <br />a minimum of two rows of coniferous trees be planted • ng : a b� He expressed that <br />these problems had not been addressed in 1997. Wi gation, he asked that <br />the landscaping be adequately watered and maintain + R ssed concern regarding <br />the noise issues. He stated he was bothered b mo R mg noise. He suggested <br />their hours of operation start at 7:00 a.m. He aske ound tests be prepared. He <br />asked there be time limits in place. He . e•� not operate their business on Saturday <br />mornings. He expressed concern about ust con 1. He expressed concern about traffic <br />flow on Fourth Avenue. He asked tw e . cony tion that the applicant stay with their <br />original traffic flow plan of 199 => ke•� ere he residents could go if they had <br />problems that could not be wor • he applicant directly. <br />John Herman ( ?sp), 785 ' ► '' ane, • 'ated he had understood that the irrigation of the <br />trees had already be • es • eviously. He asked if the applicant had a watering <br />truck. He thanked <br />ican d the Board members for working with the neighbors <br />on their conce s. He d he did not believe the Molin property met the requirements <br />of the City's z He dicated many things had changed in that area since it was first <br />zoned. He state • u rstood that the applicant had a business to run, but the neighbors <br />had lives to lead so. He stated the applicant should have to run its business within the <br />current zoning or nances. He expressed concern that Molin kept coming back for <br />further Conditional Use Permits. He expressed concern regarding the hours of operation. <br />He stated it was not reasonable to have unlimited hours of operation. He asked the <br />applicant to compromise on this issue. He expressed concern about the increase in <br />production necessary to recoup their cost of the expansion. He stated with the increase of <br />production, that would lead to additional truck traffic. He stated additional traffic was <br />not only an inconvenience, it was also a safety issue. <br />Mr. Lyden made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 7:27 p.m., and was supported <br />by Ms. Lane. Motion carried 4 -0. <br />Mr. Corson inquired about the truck traffic on Lilac and traffic turning north. He asked if <br />the roads to the north would receive additional traffic and what was the future for those <br />roads and were they able to handle this additional traffic. Mr. Smyser replied this area <br />