Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />December 12, 2001 <br />Page 6 <br />Al Robinson, 8299 Fourth Avenue, stated the Comprehensive Plan had taken three and <br />one -half years and felt that there was a very small percent of the City's population that <br />wanted growth limited. He expressed concern about the limit of 147 homes being built a <br />year. He stated they needed more people in the City to support the infrastructure it <br />currently had. He indicated the City would be sending a wrong message to developers <br />and commercial development if it went with a moratorium. He indicated Lino Lakes was <br />anti- business and that was why the taxes were so high. He stated a moratorium would <br />not make sense at this time. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked if it would make more sense to wait until the Metropolitan Council <br />had responded to the Comprehensive Plan and then address the moratorium at that time. <br />Mr. Robinson replied that would make more sense. This was not the right time for a <br />moratorium. <br />Mr. Zych stated he believed there was inadequate infrastruct . in the `' 'ty the way it <br />was. <br />Mr. Corson asked if they waited until they had a res <br />and then approved a moratorium, would the morator <br />development as well as plats already in proces <br />problems and there were no clear -cut answers to <br />ropolitan Council, <br />em to freeze residential <br />yse ' eplied that was one of the <br />Mr. Corson asked if the Metropolitan C <br />decisions on the MUSA. Mr. Smy <br />way to do it within the City and <br />Judy Barthels, indicated s <br />space would disappear i <br />adverse affect on the <br />d be asked to wait to make any <br />elieved the City needed figure out a <br />ppointed body to make those decisions. <br />paces. She expressed concern that the open <br />ing ". s allowed to develop and this would have an <br />t <br />Tom VonBisc e, Oak and developer of the Saddle Club project, stated he did not <br />have an object . a •ratorium. He stated he was working with many Cities that <br />had moratorium a as his experience that it was a very common practice to extend <br />moratoriums. H tated if the City wanted to control growth, they should contact the City <br />of Woodbury, wh were currently approving a growth plan. He indicated the City of <br />Woodbury was controlling their growth properly. He stated Woodbury was also anti- <br />growth. He indicated Lino Lakes would grow or not grow, but this would not control the <br />metropolitan growth. He asked why the Village project was exempt from the <br />moratorium, and what gave it a special position above other developers. He stated <br />developers did not like not knowing what was going on and wanted to know where the <br />City was going. <br />Connie Grundhofer, 235 Linda Avenue, asked if the Metropolitan Council had 60 days to <br />respond to the Comprehensive Plan and inquired if January was when the Metropolitan <br />Council would respond to it. Mr. Smyser replied the Metropolitan Council could extend <br />the deadline if they wanted. <br />Ms. Grundhofer asked if the Ordinances could be put in place, even not knowing what <br />the Metropolitan Council was going to do. Mr. Smyser replied the Metropolitan Council <br />• <br />• <br />