My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/08/1999 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1999
>
09/08/1999 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2014 11:32:20 AM
Creation date
7/15/2014 1:23:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
09/08/1999
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />September 8, 1999 <br />Page 5 <br />Ms. Walseth stated there are a lot of pedestrians along Holly Drive, as well as bicyclers <br />and joggers. She stated her garage is on the opposite side of the lot so her house is close <br />to the roadway. Ms. Walseth stated there is no berm or natural plantings to provide a <br />buffer or screening, even though she had requested it from the developer. <br />Mr. Corson stated the applicant has good reasons for this request but the Board needs to <br />be consistent with prior standing. He noted that last week someone wanted a variance he <br />would have liked to support. However, if granted it would weaken the ordinance. Mr. <br />Corson stated if the Planning & Zoning Board is supportive of this application, they <br />should recommend the Council amend the ordinance to make it allowable. <br />Ms. Walseth stated she is only trying to gain some privacy. <br />Acting Chair Lane asked Ms. Walseth if a variance for a six -foot fence along the east side <br />would help. Ms. Walseth stated she would prefer the fence a _ olly Drive to buffer <br />the house from the traffic. <br />Acting Chair Lane asked if a five -foot high fence w <br />stated it would be better than a four -foot fence but <br />be a special order height. She advised the esti <br />over $6,000 and will look nice with landsc <br />ble. Ms. Walseth <br />expensive since it might <br />the fencing (as proposed) is <br />Mr. Dunn stated he has empathy for t � � a. • ;; d other similar requests but the <br />decisions was clearly made by the o $ Planning & Zoning Board, supported by <br />staff and the City Council, that " a -s • eliminated and no longer be allowed. He <br />stated he finds this distressfu + ata. the decision made by the majority of the <br />Planning & Zoning Board n cil on a recent application. <br />Mr. Dunn stated that h d that each case is unique upon itself. However, the <br />Council, on advi wyer, determined it would set a precedent and could not be <br />approved. Mr. Du � ��. that until the staff and Council takes a different posture, there <br />is not much that can done. He again stated he believed every lot is different and <br />unique so he would a stain from the vote on this matter. Mr. Dunn stated he has <br />difficulty accepting staffs conclusion that this request "does not meet the Findings of <br />Fact." He stated he finds there to be a shortfall in the process for variance consideration <br />and believed this should be remedied. Mr. Dunn stated he does not have adequate <br />information to make this decision and believed there were other six -foot high fences in <br />Lino Lakes. <br />Ms. Carlson stated she does not agree with Mr. Dunn that no variances are allowed <br />because in order to grant a variance, five Findings of Fact are considered. With this case, <br />the five Findings of Fact are not met. However, there are concerns becoming more <br />prominent in Lino Lakes with the expansion of the trail system. She stated the trails are <br />wonderful for transportation of pedestrians but they do impact resident's privacy. Ms. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.