Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />January 14, 1998 <br />Page 2 <br />V. ACTION ITEMS <br />A. Continuation of Public Hearing, Telecommunication Ordinance <br />Chair Schaps opened the continuation of this public hearing at 6:36 p.m. <br />Mr. Brixius explained that development of this ordinance has been ongoing for <br />approximately five months. He indicated that his hope was to present enough <br />information at this time to close the public hearing. <br />Prior to reviewing the current draft of the ordinance, Mr. Brixius directed the Board's <br />attention to the November 19, 1997 opinion of the City Attorney's office. This opinion <br />was based upon a previous draft of the ordinance, and expresses clearly that the <br />Telecommunications Act gives Lino Lakes the authority, through zoning, to regulate the <br />placement, construction and modification of personal wireless service facilities. <br />However, the opinion went on to caution that <br />IN GENERAL. No state or local statute or regulation, <br />or other state or local legal requirement, may prohibit or <br />have the effect of prohibiting the ability of any entity to <br />provide any interstate or intrastate telecommunications <br />services. <br />Mr. Brixius stated that the draft ordinance upon which this opinion was based <br />incorporated placement of telecommunication antennas and towers in various zoning <br />designations, including commercial, industrial and semi - public. The opinion expresses <br />agreement with the appropriateness of placing them within these zones, providing the <br />City is not limiting tower or service ability to the community and that the ordinance <br />cannot be interpreted to be so restrictive as to prevent adequate provision of this utility. <br />The first draft ordinance was more lenient. Concerns addressed were placement of <br />towers and/or antennas with respect to aesthetic and environmental impact on the <br />community. The December 4 draft, which was forwarded to the Planning Commission in <br />December, includes a number of changes. Mr. Brixius mentioned that a meeting had <br />taken place with MnDOT and U.S. West at which two issues were discussed: (1) <br />Placement of a personal wireless service antenna for use by U.S. West, and (2) location of <br />an emergency public safety tower for MnDOT which would serve State patrol, Anoka <br />County including the local correctional facility, and some local police band radio <br />communications. <br />In review of the 12/4/97 draft ordinance, Mr. Brixius directed the Board's attention first <br />to Section 1, which consists of pertinent definitions. Section 1.1. through 1.6. refer to the <br />various types of antennas and their distinctly separate treatment. Mr. Brixius reviewed <br />certain additional definitions of particular note, such as Secondary Use. He pointed out <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />