My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/13/1998 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1998
>
05/13/1998 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2014 11:19:12 AM
Creation date
7/16/2014 8:47:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
05/13/1998
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />May 13, 1998 <br />Page 11 <br />Ms. Wyland stated that the City cannot enforce conditions regarding a rezone. The City <br />can, however, stipulate conditions for a plat. She explained that this is why the Board is <br />hesitant to approve the rezone. <br />Mr. Dunn noted that it is customary to rezone with a plat. Mr. Menkveld indicated that <br />was not true in most cities. He stated that during the platting process of Highland <br />Meadow I, the neighbors were told the property would be used for multi - family housing. <br />Mr. Wessel noted the importance of the Comprehensive Plan. The City is not directing <br />North Suburban Development to build multi - family housing. The Comprehensive Plan <br />only suggests the idea of multi - family housing. He advised that the Comprehensive Plan <br />has not yet been formally recommended. <br />Mr. Dunn stated that he felt a 30 day tabling of the issue was appropriate to settle the <br />issues before a decision can be made. He believes that June 1, 1998, is a self imposed <br />deadline. He encouraged all of those involved to work with the City. <br />Mr. Menkveld asked if the Board would consider the rezoning without a detailed plan, or <br />if the Board would continually delay the property owners. <br />Mr. Dunn stated that zoning and a site plan are different issues. If the City requires both <br />a problem will occur. He indicated he has no problem with the zoning being independent <br />of the site plan. <br />Mr. Schilling asked if the Board would be able to vote on a proposed rezone at the next <br />meeting. <br />Mr. Corson stated that if the Board approves the rezone to R -3, the site plan could not be <br />denied if all of the requirements were met. The issue has been addressed before and a site <br />plan was required for other developers. He would like the City to be consistent. <br />Mr. Dunn said that occasionally exceptions are made. If an unacceptable site plan was <br />proposed after the rezone, the Board would be faced with a policy decision. <br />Mr. Trehus stated that exceptions should not be made. All information should be <br />presented before a decision is made. <br />Mr. Dunn said that developers will not spend money on a site plan without the desired <br />zoning. <br />Mr. Corson stated that two citizens of the City have concerns that have not yet been <br />resolved and if the City approves the rezone an unacceptable plat could be forced on <br />them. Ms. Wyland explained that if the front of the property remains R -1 and the rear of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.