Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />August 12, 1998 <br />Page 6 <br />Chair Schaps asked how much land to the south the developer owns. Mr. Quigly <br />indicated the developer owns 80 acres. The park to the north did not pan out because of a <br />zoning change. <br />Mr. Trehus stated there are many street jogs in the plan. The greenway corridor needs to <br />be reviewed. There are a lot of issues that need to be resolved. Mr. Quigly stated 2 of the <br />street jogs will be eliminated. The emphasis of the Park Board was the trail. <br />Chair Schaps expressed his concern regarding the park location and size. He stated the <br />number of children in the area needs to be reviewed. Ball fields are needed in this area. <br />The Park Board needs to address these issues before a decision is made. Mr. Quigly <br />stated that is not what the Park Board is looking for. <br />Mr. Corson asked if there is a plan for paving the trails in phase 1 and 2. Ms. Wyland <br />indicated the trails are due to be paved in the next few weeks. <br />Mr. Schilling asked about the time line for the 3rd addition. He asked if the Board is <br />comfortable with accommodation of the future extensions regarding this development. <br />Mr. Quigly indicated phase 1 will begin this fall. Phase 2 of the 3rd addition will begin <br />next spring. <br />Mr. Powell indicated the future extension will serve the entire concept plan. <br />Mr. George Latondra, an attorney for a property owner, came forward and asked if the <br />Planning Board or the Park Board makes the decisions regarding park placement. He <br />also asked if a park proposal is made without involving ball fields will the plat be denied. <br />Chair Schaps indicated that both the Planning and Zoning Board and Park Board will <br />offer input regarding park placement. The final decision is made by the City Council. <br />Chair Schaps stated now is the time for residents in that community to come forward and <br />inform the Park Board of their needs. <br />Mr. Latondra stated he is concerned about the interplay between the two boards. <br />Chair Schaps stated the Planning and Zoning Board will not say the Park Board is wrong. <br />He stated the Park Board needs time to review the park placement. <br />Mr. Cain came forward and encouraged the Board to approve the rezoning so he can get <br />on with his life. He stated he lives in the middle of the development. He owns 20 acres <br />with horses and cattle. Houses are beginning to line his property line. Without the <br />rezone he cannot sell his property. He stated the City has put him in a bad position. It <br />only seems appropriate to continue the process of Clearwater Creek development. <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />