My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/09/1998 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1998
>
09/09/1998 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2014 11:16:19 AM
Creation date
7/16/2014 9:00:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
09/09/1998
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />September 9, 1998 <br />Page 4 <br />Mr. Uhde explained that a document is required at closing that states the landowner must <br />hook up to City sewer and water when it is available if their septic system fails. This <br />document could be filed with the County also. He stated that it is possible the area will <br />never be added to the MUSA. It is a big risk. The worst case scenario would involve <br />going before the Metropolitan Council and requesting that parcel be added to the MUSA. <br />Mr. Uhde commented on the discouraging factors regarding approval. He stated that the <br />MUSA issue is a risk for the developer. Regarding the nonconforming lot he believes <br />there is additional room on the site for an alternative septic system. Regarding future <br />development, if there is no more property acquired in the area they will be able to <br />develop at least two large lots. <br />Chair Schaps asked about access to the lots. Mr. Uhde referred to the map and indicated <br />there is access to the lots from the east. <br />Chair Schaps asked if he has spoken with all property owners in the area. Mr. Uhde <br />explained he is working will the property owners. One home would have to be moved. <br />Another property owner would have to be bought out completely. He has met with the <br />property owners twice and they are in the process of making a decision. <br />Mr. Johnson stated that if all property is acquired there will be a short street into the <br />property. Mr. Uhde stated it would be a loop street. <br />Mr. Dunn expressed concern regarding incorporating new residences around existing <br />property. The existing property does not seem to integrate with the neighborhood. He <br />asked if there are better ways to integrate more effectively. Mr. Uhde stated it is always <br />the goal of the developer to blend well. Individual land owners have individual rights. <br />The developer makes an offer and works with the existing property owners as best they <br />can. <br />Mr. Dunn asked if there is anything in the City Ordinances that refer to a marriage of old <br />and new. Ms. Wyland indicated she is not aware of any such ordinances. <br />Mr. Dunn stated that issue should be discussed. He stated he is in support of a land bank. <br />Mr. Uhde is taking all the risk. <br />Chair Schaps asked what stage of the phasing they are currently in. Mr. Uhde stated they <br />are into the 3rd and 4th Phase. There are 36 lots and half of them are currently sold. <br />Their projection was 25 lots per year. They are currently at 30 units per year. Phase 5 <br />will start in late fall. There will be 26 lots in Phase 5. The 6th Addition will begin in the <br />year 2000. <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.