My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/09/1998 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1998
>
09/09/1998 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2014 11:16:19 AM
Creation date
7/16/2014 9:00:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
09/09/1998
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />September 9, 1998 <br />Page 9 <br />Chair Schaps stated the park is in the same place. Mr. Brixius noted the park had not <br />been placed on the previous plat. <br />Chair Schaps stated the revised plat is not consistent with the desires of the Park Board or <br />the Planning & Zoning Board's recommendations. Mr. Brixius verified that the revised <br />plat is not consistent with the Planning & Zoning Board's recommendations. <br />Chair Schaps stated a number of things have not been done to the revised plat. He noted <br />they may have not been done due to a lack of time. <br />Mr. Johnson stated that the tree preservation is crucial to the layout. He indicated he <br />would like to see a tree preservation plan and talk to the City Forester and Environmental <br />Board. <br />Mr. Dunn stated that he feels uncomfortable with moving forward at this time. They <br />have given the applicant more time to meet the requirements for land acquisition. They <br />have given specific guidance to the applicant that has been ignored. He stated he feels it <br />is mandatory for the applicant to meet with the Park Board before coming back to the <br />Planning & Zoning Board. He stated he is not opposed to the project he just does not <br />believe it is ready. <br />Mr. Corson stated the trees are a big issue. He expressed concern regarding a macro scale <br />and staff viewing it on a micro scale. He suggested identifying each lot and each tree to <br />be saved on each lot. Mr. Brixius stated staff has not given the project that consideration. <br />Staff has looked at design. He stated he is hesitant to recommend approval of the <br />application. <br />Mr. Corson suggested looking into a tree preservation plan and perhaps having a <br />presentation made to the Board regarding this issue. Mr. Brixius stated that a <br />recommendation for approval could include comments from the City Forester and <br />Environmental Board. <br />Mr. Jackson stated the City does do a micro scale view of subdivisions by addresses. Mr. <br />Asleson does visit the sites and determine which spots require tree preservation. The <br />process is very effective. <br />Mr. Mike Quigly, Gor -em LLC, came forward and stated he felt it is not fair to say they <br />have ignored the Board's recommendations. He stated they have gone overboard in <br />responding in a timely manner. Some areas regarding the recommendations are not in his <br />control. When the property is platted it will meet all the City Ordinances. <br />Chair Schaps asked if Mr. Quigly has met with the Park Board and received a <br />recommendation from them. Mr. Quigly indicated he has not met with the Park Board. <br />The Park Board has asked for a 3 acre parcel of park land within the plat. The Park <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.