Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />October 14, 1998 <br />Page 14 <br />Mr. Corson reviewed the situation with 800 some acres in Blaine that were considered <br />wetlands by the Corp of Engineers but the poor soils were removed and it is now being <br />developed into a golf course and residential development. He stated the City needs to be <br />careful about making decisions based on unsuitable soils because things can change. Mr. <br />Corson stated he has some experience with the Minnesota Trust and while it is good in <br />concept, you need to donate the land plus pay a $5,000 fee plus there is a one year delay <br />until they take it into their possession. He noted this may be an obstacle and should be <br />used careful, possibly expediting that process. Mr. Corson reviewed a process in Ham <br />Lake where a PUD development process is allowed but includes a requirement for open <br />space as well. He stated his concern about not identifying density incentives but stated he <br />believes Staff will present something appropriate. <br />Mr. Brixius explained that when Staff drafts ordinance language the density incentives <br />will be identified. <br />Mr. Corson stated the lighting issue was addressed and asked that the quantity issue also <br />be addressed. He stated he supports disbursing multi - family housing throughout the City <br />and including mobile homes within the Code inspection program. Mr. Corson asked how <br />soon the zoning needs to be consistent with the Land Use. Mr. Brixius stated the City has <br />eleven months to establish zoning that is consistent. <br />Chair Schaps suggested the Board forward all of these comments to the attention of the <br />City Council in condensed form prior to their meeting so they can be considered prior to <br />their action. <br />Mr. Dunn stated this process is consistent with what was previously agreed upon. <br />Mr. Robinson asked if the zoning should be changed on the property mentioned on Lake <br />Drive. He stated the property was zoned commercial for many years and the City asked if <br />they would change it to residential. The property owner agreed because the City <br />indicated they would allow an appropriate commercial development. <br />Mr. Johnson noted adoption of the Plan would not bind the use to that parcel. Mr. <br />Brixius stated that is incorrect and explained that once this arrangement is completed <br />Staff will draft regulations and language that specify zoning districts and uses within that <br />particular district. <br />Mr. Johnson asked if there will be no opportunity to amend the zoning identified on the <br />map, once the Plan is adopted. Mr. Brixius stated that as time passes there are abilities <br />for the Council to make amendments or change a land use arrangement. <br />Mr. Dunn stated when this was discussed at the Task Force meeting, they were under the <br />impression it would be considered spot zoning which is not allowed. He stated if this is <br />not correct, he would entertain revising that particular property since it is conducive for <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />