Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />October 14, 1998 <br />Page 16 <br />takes exception to. <br />Mr. Brixius clarified that this is not what is being represented. He explained the new <br />households may be the same but the current households will be declining lower than the <br />3.3 rate. <br />Mr. Trehus stated based on these numbers, in the year 2000 there will be 4,845 homes <br />which means 7,785 homes in 2020 and a population (using current population per <br />household figures) of 25,690 which is about what the Metropolitan Council is looking <br />for. Mr. Trehus stated it is arguable to say this is a reduction from Metropolitan <br />Council's figures. He next addressed growth zone boundaries which are being expanded <br />and could support 250 to 300 homes per year if most of the soils are buildable. He stated <br />that the growth zones incorporate a MUSA bank concept so there will not be <br />development pressure since there would not be MUSA allocation. He stated that <br />landowners within the MUSA are generally taxed at a higher rate and the MUSA bank <br />concept is attempting to get around this. <br />Mr. Brixius explained this is the concept as well as the flexibility of using it in different <br />areas because of nonassessed value associated with the MUSA designation. <br />Mr. Trehus stated he talked with someone from the Anoka County Assessor's office who <br />indicated they will make sure the properties are valued at the MUSA designation rate <br />prior to plat approval. They will not wait until MUSA is applied at the time of the plat to <br />raise the property values. Mr. Trehus stated the growth zones are 100% larger (with <br />hydric soils) than needed to create double the development pressure since there will be <br />double the opportunity for development requests. Also, within that area they will be <br />evaluated at a higher rate. <br />Mr. Brixius stated Staff did talk with the Anoka County Assessor's office initially in <br />1995 and again in 1998. With regard to soils, Mr. Brixius stated this has been explained <br />and based on past subdivisions, on average, the amount of wetlands within a subdivision <br />are generally 1.5 times larger than shown on the NWI. Mr. Brixius stated Staff tried to <br />identify areas of expanded wetlands using hydric soils based on the information they had. <br />He stated it is a standard practice to ask for MUSA based on 1.5 times its Plan <br />amendment. He noted it is written in the language of the Plan that MUSA would be <br />applied on final plat approval, all platting procedures must comply with the Zoning <br />Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan, and there are protections on the size of the final plat. <br />If this is not effective, the City can fall back on the moratorium basis. Mr. Brixius stated <br />what is being done is not contrary to what is in the Plan. <br />Mr. Trehus stated he has a number of concerns and reservation with the Plan. He noted <br />the document from Councilmembers Lyden and Dahl containing their comments on the <br />Plan which was on the table tonight but not included in the meeting packet. <br />• <br />• <br />