Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />November 12, 1998 <br />Page 10 <br />Mr. Trehus suggested the policy regarding street lights be reviewed. He asked if the new <br />street lights will match what is currently in the area. Mr. Powell stated the new street <br />lights will be consistent unless NSP has changed their design. <br />Mr. Dunn stated the proposed Comprehensive Plan does direct the City to study and <br />develop a lighting plan. It is possible that Ordinances may be developed regarding street <br />lighting. He stated that he believes the applicant has met all the requirements for <br />approval. This is a good development for the City. The development will be a forcing <br />issue to correct 62nd Street, which is another step in meeting the goals of improving the <br />City's infrastructure. He stated he would not like to see a cul -de -sac, but would like to <br />see good progress on 62nd Street. The issues from residents should be incorporated into <br />the action that the City takes. He indicated he would like to move forward on this <br />project. He is in favor of the project. He stated the traffic is unfortunate, but does not <br />believe this project will add to that problem. <br />Mr. Trehus read page 26 from the proposed Comprehensive Plan regarding premature <br />expansion to a rural area. He stated this needs to be considered. He also read page 79, <br />which referred to rural land uses and preserving open space. He read the staff <br />recommendation from two months ago regarding the extension of 62nd Street. He noted <br />the disadvantages of reconstructing 62nd Street now as opposed to later. This project will <br />add more traffic to a rural area. According to the proposed Comprehensive Plan this <br />development is premature. He noted there are only 58 acres left in the City's MUSA <br />bank. This project will take 19 acres of the MUSA bank which will leave the City <br />limited regarding business development until more MUSA is obtained. He stated the <br />MUSA issue is a reason to deny approval of the project. <br />Mr. Wessel stated no additional MUSA is needed for business development in the City. <br />MUSA is not an issue. <br />Mr. Johnson made a MOTION, and was supported by Mr. Corson, to approve the rezone <br />of West Shadow Pond. Motion carried 6 -1 with Mr. Trehus voting no. <br />Mr. Johnson made a MOTION, and was supported by Mr. Dunn, to approve a <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment to introduce MUSA to the West Shadow Pond site. <br />Motion carried 6 -1 with Mr. Trehus voting no. <br />Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve the West Shadow Pond Preliminary Plat, based <br />on the following conditions: <br />1. The Preliminary Utility Plan is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. <br />2. The City Engineer shall review and comment on the capabilities of 62nd Street and <br />whether the funding and resources available is sufficient to support upgrade of the 62nd <br />Street. <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />