My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/09/1997 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1997
>
04/09/1997 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2014 11:09:45 AM
Creation date
7/16/2014 9:27:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
04/09/1997
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />April 9, 1997 <br />Page 21 <br />Mr. Robinson made a MOTION to approve a variance of 3 feet to allow a <br />wheelchair entrance access to be built 7 feet from the septic system at 850 <br />Orange Street. He was supported by Ms. Dahl. The motion carried, 6 -0. <br />G. Comprehensive Plan, Districts I and II, PUBLIC HEARING <br />Chair Schaps declared the hearing open at 9:30 p.m. <br />Mr. Brixius stated that the proposed update to the Comprehensive Plan is part of <br />the metropolitan regional planning mandate to be completed by 1998. It is not <br />anticipated that the entire plan will be done for another year. However, specific <br />attention to Districts I and II is needed for the development of the new village and <br />town center. The study area for planning District I is bounded by the I- <br />35W /Highway 23 interchange, 4th Avenue, 77th Street and the regional park. <br />This area has historically been identified as the potential economic development <br />area for commercial and industrial development. The primary issue in this area <br />relates to transportation, such as access to I -35W, the capacity needed for the <br />future and a future traffic signal at I -35W and Highway 23. It is anticipated that <br />Highway 23 will become a major thoroughfare through the community. The land <br />uses under review reflect existing land uses with some modifications. The area <br />is currently zoned rural /single family residential. With the expansion of Apollo <br />Industrial Park, it is anticipated that medium to high density residential will be <br />appropriate. The northeast quadrant is shown to continue with commercial <br />zoning as it currently exists. The land use designation for the southwest corner <br />is light industrial with controlled access points onto Highway 23. The most <br />unique area is the southeast quadrant where the town center is intended to be <br />located, and a variety of land uses are needed -- commercial development will <br />provide the village feeling; medium density residential is shown on the eastern <br />border; the existing single family residential will be maintained on Marshan Lane <br />and to the south. <br />Mr. Brixius stated that District II contains the Highway 49 corridor area, which is <br />now Highway 23 with the transfer of jurisdiction from the state to the county. <br />New development of the middle school has brought focus to transportation <br />considerations in that area also. District II is bounded by I -35W on the north, the <br />regional park on the east, the City of Circle Pines on the west and the regional <br />park to the south. The transportation issues are related to the City's ability to <br />establish convenient access points along Highway 23 for area residents. <br />Redevelopment can only occur at the time sewer becomes available. The <br />District land uses include existing sewered residential neighborhoods, medium <br />density development, senior housing, public uses, such as churches and school <br />as a transition from the freeway to residential areas. A limited commercial area <br />is shown along Hodgson Road and Highway 23 that will be compatible with <br />residential neighborhoods. The seaplane base raises two issues: 1) the <br />question of what would be the appropriate land use in that vicinity, and 2) <br />whether general business would be an appropriate land use with the residential <br />area. A performance based land use area was established that would require <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.