Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />August 13. 1997 <br />Page 11 <br />Mr. Dunn asked the price range of the homes. <br />Mr. Krueger stated that the homes will be priced between $120,000 and $130,000. <br />Mr. Robinson made a MOTION to call a five- minute break at 9:20 p.m. to allow the set <br />up of a model illustration of the proposed development. Ms. Dahl seconded the motion. <br />Motion carried unanimously, 7 -0. <br />Chair Schaps reconvened the meeting at 9:25 p.m. <br />Mr. Rick Harrison, Development Planner, stated that the development is planned in a <br />cove design. Lot widths are narrower at the setback line, approximately 80 feet. With <br />the change in width, more green space will be in front yards for a visually pleasing <br />streetscape. There is a reduction of lineal feet of pavement needed for the street with the <br />coving design. Homes are set further back on the curved roads. The average lot size is <br />over 13,000 square feet. Lots are bigger by cutting down on the amount of road needed. <br />All homes will have three -car garages. Where possible three -way T intersections are <br />planned and four -way intersections are avoided unless there is an existing road. <br />Mr. Dunn asked the lot widths at the curb line. <br />Mr. Harrison stated that he does not have an accurate answer. The width is less than <br />standard, perhaps 45 to 50 feet. With the house set further back on the lots, there will be <br />longer driveways and more parking area. The townhouse area will be used as a transition <br />from single family development to the commercial area south east of the development. <br />Chair Schaps suggested that the Board table action and continue the public hearing until <br />the September meeting to give the developer time to hold another neighborhood meeting <br />and address the many questions and concerns that have been raised at this hearing. <br />Neighboring residents do not know enough about this project, as evidenced by the many <br />questions and concerns. He noted that the school district is informed about new <br />development. Sometimes the City receives a response but not always. He agreed that it <br />would be appropriate to seek a response from the school district regarding this proposal. <br />Mr. Gelbmann stated that there are disadvantages with small back yards. He also noted <br />that the intersection at 79th Avenue appears to be a difficult corner and expressed concern <br />about traffic problems there. <br />Mr. Krueger stated that according to the traffic study, a very low traffic impact is <br />expected. It is anticipated that only two cars at a time will be stacked at the intersection <br />of 79th Avenue. <br />Mr. Johnson stated that one of the conditions of PDO zoning is that in return for <br />flexibility in relaxing stipulations of lot design, the City would receive a quality product. <br />Curved streets are visually pleasing, but sight distance is limited. Traffic may be slower, <br />but unexpected situations can be encountered. He suggested contacting the Police Chief <br />for his input. <br />Mr. Krueger responded that whether the development is with a cove design or the same as <br />other blocks makes no difference to him. Actually, coving creates more work, but the <br />result looks great. <br />