My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/10/1997 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1997
>
09/10/1997 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2014 11:04:05 AM
Creation date
7/16/2014 9:50:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
09/10/1997
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />September 10, 1997 <br />Page 13 <br />Developers who are involved with the initial design do not have to address future <br />concerns of requested variances. The future vision of 79th Street and surrounding areas is <br />the decision the Board needs to address. This development is consistent with that vision <br />according to the Comprehensive Plan except that the Plan calls for low density. The <br />issue to determine is whether to allow medium density. <br />Mr. Johnson expressed concern about the relationship of the townhomes to what will be <br />developed between them and Lake Drive. He would be more comfortable if there was a <br />high density district between the development with the possibility of access from Lake <br />Drive. It is important to pay attention to what is developed to the east. <br />Mr. Brixius agreed and expressed concern that no future access to the east will occur until <br />there is development in that direction. Thirty -two units will be relying on a single point <br />of access. He stated that larger single family lots are planned along 79th Street up to this <br />development. Between 79th and 77th Streets are two zoning districts. What is important <br />is what the Board perceives this area to be. <br />Chair Schaps expressed his difficulty with the fact that the Board expressed concern with <br />the triangular lots at the last meeting and those have not been changed. Although he <br />understands the economic issue for the developer, he does not believe it will make a big <br />difference in the number of lots. The City is prepared to give enormous concessions in <br />the PDO in terms of setbacks and density. At a minimum the developer needs to respond <br />favorably to the City's planning consultant recommendations. <br />Mr. Bruce Krueger, representing the developer, stated that he is not trying to ignore the <br />City's concerns but is seeking feedback and guidance. He is not sure what the impact will <br />be to change the triangular lots. <br />Mr. Harrison stated that one shift will shift everything. He noted that most units will <br />have three -car garages and adequate storage area. With regard to access, he suggested a <br />10 -foot emergency access that could also be used as a pedestrian access. <br />Ms. Dahl asked why townhomes are included in the plan instead of all single family <br />residential. <br />Mr. Krueger stated that the townhomes will buffer adjacent industrial uses. <br />It was the consensus of the Board to vote on this application as a total package and not <br />split approvals, i.e., approve rezoning but not the preliminary plat until City concerns are <br />addressed. <br />Mr. Dunn made a MOTION to continue consideration of this application as discussed and <br />was supported by Mr. Herr. <br />Discussion: <br />Mr. Johnson offered an amendment to the motion to include a declaration of general <br />support for rezoning, the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and the PDO. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.