Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />October 8, 1997 <br />Page 25 <br />Mr. Dunn asked how many people are employed by Rice Industries. Ms. Vass responded <br />that there are currently 11 employees, 6 salespeople (2 out of Milwaukee), and 5 office <br />staff in the Shoreview facility. <br />Mr. Johnson clarified that no manufacturing would take place at the proposed location. <br />Ms. Vass responded that it would not at present, but expansion is planned to light <br />assembly. <br />Mr. Gelbmann made a MOTION to approve the Rice Industries Site Plan Review and <br />Minor Subdivision according to the conditions outlined above, and was supported by Ms. <br />Dahl. Motion carried 5 -0. <br />Mr. Johnson indicated that this matter will go before the City Council on October 27, <br />1997. <br />G. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING, Telecommunication Ordinance <br />This item was continued for further consideration. <br />H. Public Hearing, Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment(s) <br />• Mr. Johnson opened the public hearing on this matter at 10:32 p.m. <br />Ms. Wyland reminded the Board that it approved a conditional use permit for an <br />automobile and truck repair use at 7313 Lake Drive with the condition that an ordinance <br />amendment be considered which would allow the parking of vehicles waiting for repair. <br />The proposed ordinance amends Section 7, Subd. 3, H.6.i which currently reads as <br />follows: <br />"All outside storage shall be prohibited. The storage of damaged vehicles, <br />vehicles being repaired and vehicle parts and accessory equipment must be <br />completely inside a principal or accessory building." <br />The proposed language would allow customer vehicles to be parked outside but prohibit <br />other exterior storage. The proposed language is as follows: <br />"Outside storage shall be limited to customer vehicles waiting for repair, all <br />other outside storage is prohibited. The storage of damaged vehicles, vehicle <br />parts and accessory equipment must be completely inside a principal or <br />accessory building." <br />Mr. Johnson expressed concern about reference to storage of "damaged" vehicles. <br />• Following discussion, the proposed language was changed to read as follows: <br />