11/12/1997 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning & Zoning Board • November 12, 1997 Page 15 Mr. Dunn asked if the revised Ordinance could be obtained prior to the next meeting in the event that it is completed prior to that date. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Grading Plans/Policv Mr. Robinson stated that ultimate development plans do not necessarily reflect the original intent. He asked Mr. Ahrens to explain how this process works. Mr. Ahrens explained that initially all developers provide a grading plan which is reviewed by Staff and a consulting engineer for the purpose of arriving at a plan satisfactory to all parties. As building permits are issued, builders must comply with the established grading plan. Mr. Ahrens stated that if changes occur they are reviewed and, if not acceptable, revision is required. As building takes place, inspectors focus on the structure itself rather than grading. Mr. Ahrens suggested that field changes might be appropriate to include the grading plan. He added that he personally attempts to visit all project sites at the time grading is taking place, and accuracy within 2/10 of a foot of the plan is expected. Mr. Ahrens also explained that site additions, such as landscaping considerations, might create a deviation. Of course, accidental miscalculations can take place. Mr. Robinson stated that his concern is over the City's liability in this regard. He mentioned a regrading project near Miller South Glen. Mr. Ahrens explained that in that case the developer corrected the problem, and that customarily the developer is responsible for such a correction. However, he did suggest that perhaps the City's development contract should be amended to establish the period for which the City would hold a developer's letter of credit. Mr. Robinson suggested that an inspection be included prior to any planting, which would eliminate a homeowner altering terrain in such a way as to create problems for neighboring properties. Mr. Ahrens referred to an "as -built survey" of a yard, which might be a possibility for inclusion in development projects. Mr. Robinson indicated a need to address this issue in a formal manner. Mr. Ahrens suggested that with Ms. Dahl taking a seat on the City Council, perhaps the time is right to discuss the issue at that level. Mr. Dunn asked if the requirement that a developer's engineer shall certify in writing that all grading complies with the grading plan upon completion of grading could be a remedy for the City to deal with such problems as mentioned above. Mr. Ahrens stated that this is a requirement prior to release of a letter of credit. Beyond that point, property owners have the ability to make changes. Certain developers incorporate individual protections. •