My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/13/1996 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1996
>
11/13/1996 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2014 10:57:48 AM
Creation date
7/16/2014 10:19:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
11/13/1996
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />November 13, 1996 <br />urban areas within a rural community. When urban areas are fully developed, <br />further urban growth would not be allowed without amending the Comprehensive <br />Plan and zoning ordinance. <br />Mr. Dunn requested a review of the language under Subd. 1. R, Rural District to <br />be sure it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Mr. Brixius stated that as the Comprehensive Plan is revised to address the <br />overall growth strategy and once urban and rural areas are established in the <br />Comprehensive Plan, it will be a priority to amend the zoning ordinance to be <br />consistent. <br />Mr. Johnson noted that the first two purposes stated are preservationist in nature <br />and could be stated in one sentence. Nos. 3. and 4. are concerned with phases <br />and the nature of change which are confusing and could be further clarified into <br />a single statement describing the City's policy toward change. It may be less <br />confusing to group this listing in this way. <br />Mr. Dunn referred Board members to page 9 -5, Subd. 2. RBR, Rural- Business <br />Reserve District, and noted that there are residents who have expressed <br />concern about Comprehensive Plan revisions because they have built homes in <br />an RBR zoning district and are finding themselves boxed in as to how their <br />property can be sold because the zoning district is going to be enforced as it was <br />originally intended. He asked if there is a way to strengthen paragraph A., so <br />that it is absolutely clear that people need to be aware of what they are doing <br />when they build a residential home in the RBR zoning district. He does not want <br />to leave any room for misinterpretation or misunderstandings. <br />Mr. Brixius stated that the distinct difference between RBR and a Rural District is <br />that the Rural District is intended to be rural until such time as the City <br />determines its ultimate Tong -range use. RBR zoning is a way to forewarn <br />property owners that the area is designated to be economic, commercial <br />development, but property owners are to have full use of their property for rural <br />purposes until that time. The RBR District is the only zoning district with an <br />interim use. <br />Mr. Robinson asked for the definition of the trigger mechanism that would rezone <br />an RBR District. <br />Chair Schaps referred Board members to page 9 -11 where the rezoning trigger <br />mechanism is addressed. <br />Mr. Brixius stated that the language is maintained in its original integrity with the <br />exception that RBR Districts are expanded to allow the same uses as Rural <br />Districts. <br />Mr. Johnson asked how RBR districts are rezoned, whether by property owners <br />or by the City. He believes these districts should be rezoned only by the City. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.