09/11/1996 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning & Zoning Board September 11, 1996 • variance knowing that another location would comply with the code, even if it is Tess • • desirable? Ms. Sullivan stated that the 120 -foot width is required to make up for the 30 -foot setback. If the lot width is not 120 feet and there is no compensation for the setback, they are being penalized for having a corner lot. Mr. Johnson stated that the lot was purchased as it exists with all of its ramifications. He is dismayed to learn that storage sheds can be built without a building permit. If this one is allowed, others will want to do the same thing and will do it without permission. He expressed concern about the City being able to guard the setback area. Chair Schaps agreed and stated that everyone is faced with complying with the same regulations. He is not sure the lot is unique because the conditions of the lot were known at the time of purchase. Ms. Sullivan stated that they purchased a flat lot. The issue of grade is the drainage easement. The easement was not indicated on the survey and they had no idea there was a drainage pipe on the lot. There was a drainage pipe indicated on the lot behind them. She further stated that if misinformation is given by the City, then the City should be held accountable. Mr. John Sullivan stated that he is not trying to point fingers, but he talked with City officials at least five times. He threw those notes away believing that everything was okay for this structure. Chair Schaps stated that he understands the Sullivans believe they received misinformation and wants the City to recognize what happened. Ms. Sullivan stated that their lot is unique because there is not another property in Lino Lakes that has the same drainage easement situation and the setback problem. Mr. Herr stated that he would support negotiations for a shared expense on the part of the Sullivans and the City to move the shed and would consider a compromise setback of 15 feet. Ms. Sullivan stated that a reasonable place has to be found. She does not want it in the front yard. Chair Schaps suggested that option No. 3 be taken and the issue be returned to staff for further consideration. Next month the issue can be revisited to make sure arrangements are workable for both parties. 19