Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />September 11, 1996 <br />Mr. Al Brixius, City Planning Consultant, stated that the City received an application to <br />create a subdivision of 48 single family Tots, to be known as Miller South Glen. It is <br />located at the northeast corner of Ware Road and 62nd Street. In order to <br />accommodate this development, a number of things would have to occur: <br />1. Allocation of 27.9 acres of the City's interim MUSA <br />reserve /Comprehensive Plan amendment; <br />2. Rezoning the property from R, Rural to R -1X, Single Family Executive; <br />3. Vacation of an existing road easement within the property; <br />4. Preliminary plat <br />5. Variance to allow a cul -de -sac in excess of 500 feet in <br />Mr. Brixius stated that if the City decides that the rezoning is appropriate, an <br />expansion of MUSA must take place to include the subject property. This would involve <br />allocating 27.9 buildable acres from the150+ interim MUSA acres to the subject <br />property, subject to the following conditions: 1) the Land Use Plan is amended to <br />designate low density residential use of the site; and 2) the subject property is found to <br />meet the applicable MUSA reserve criteria. The reserve criteria are listed in the staff <br />report. Utilities are available through already subdivided areas. The Park Board <br />believes this development is generally consistent with what is proposed for that area; it <br />is also consistent with the sewer and water comp plans. One of the biggest concerns is <br />whether 62nd Street can adequately serve additional development. If the finding is <br />made that the roadways are not adequate, consideration of a subdivision at this time <br />would be premature. <br />Chair Schaps noted that the Comprehensive Plan Task Force is underway to determine <br />and uses throughout the City, and it may be premature for this property to be <br />developed before the Task Force has studied the area. <br />Mr. Brixius noted that there has not been a formal moratorium placed on development, <br />and the City is obligated to consider any application on its own merit. <br />Mr. Wessel stated that at the City Council meeting Monday, September 10, 1996, No. <br />11 of the MUSA criteria was modified to state that roadways serving the proposed <br />development should be determined to be adequate to handle additional traffic as <br />determined by an independent traffic engineer. If the roads are determined to be <br />inadequate, the development proposal should be denied unless there is a financial <br />commitment to upgrade the roadways. In addition, the City Council stipulated that <br />MUSA would be allocated in the following manner: 1) 50 acres in 1996; 2) 50 acres in <br />1997; and 50 acres in 1998. It is hoped that this requirement will provide an opportunity <br />for a balance continuum of commercial and residential development. <br />