My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/11/1996 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1996
>
09/11/1996 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2014 10:46:54 AM
Creation date
7/16/2014 11:09:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
09/11/1996
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />September 11, 1996 <br />• <br />Dunn further requested that the agenda of this meeting include a discussion on what <br />information is necessary to have before the Board reviews a development package. He <br />noted that Mr. Carlson has not contacted the Rice Creek Watershed. He does not <br />believe that all of the information will be available in 30 days and the project should be <br />postponed longer. <br />Dahl stated that the school district also needs to be considered. School officials have <br />stated that the Rice Lake Elementary School has inadequate capacity. She does not <br />feel comfortable with this project because it will raise taxes for everyone. She asked if <br />the traffic study could include information on the impact to area schools. This is not the <br />only proposal that will come before the City and Rice Creek Elementary is already <br />overcrowded or will be shortly. She does not want to see citizens have to pay for <br />another school. <br />Mr. Ahrens stated that the traffic study would not relate to the impact on the school <br />district. <br />Mr. Wessel stated that any impact to the school district will be part of the <br />comprehensive planning process. <br />Ms. Maureen Dreyfus stated that she lives on Linden Lane and has prepared a petition <br />which she submitted. She stated that the Board needs to be aware that <br />predevelopment work has been done which has created an eyesore for neighbors <br />abutting the property. Neighbors are concerned about the subdivision because there is <br />a mound of dirt with a huge hole that is retaining water. Residents do not want water in <br />their back yards. If this project is tabled too long, there will be problems. Neighbors <br />have met with City officials and Mr. Carlson who has promised to have answers <br />regarding drainage. <br />Dunn asked what the petition is requesting. <br />Ms. Dreyfus stated that the petition is concerned with the predevelopment work that is <br />being done and is beyond what the City approved to date. Residents are requesting <br />that Mr. Carlson fulfill his commitment to address the drainage problem for Park Grove. <br />There is concern that any additional building will add to the drainage problem. She <br />does not have a clear understanding of the runoff plan. Ponds have been dug and <br />residents are not happy with the way they were laid out and the direction they were <br />supposed to flow. <br />Dunn asked what authorization or permit was given for work to begin. He also asked if <br />Rice Creek Watershed has been contacted. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.