Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />October 9, 1996 <br />Mr. Wessel stated that the Council is not recommending that the structure <br />remain in its present location. The suggestion is for the Sullivans to review their <br />options and possibly move it within the setback area which would still require a <br />variance. The Sullivans have the prerogative to pursue the original variance. <br />Ms. Dahl stated that because there could have been a miscommunication by <br />both parties and since the structure is standing and there are no permits or <br />precedent set for this type of circumstance, she would support grandfathering <br />this structure in to remain where it is. Since the Council suggested the Sullivans <br />pursue a variance, she would support the variance. <br />Mr. Herr stated that he would like to see more flexibility. He would not support <br />this variance but possibly would support a smaller variance of 15 feet. He <br />agreed with the Sullivans on the constraints of the property but cannot support <br />the variance as presented. <br />Chair Schaps stated that it is clear there has been miscommunication between <br />the two parties, and he does not believe the miscommunication is one - sided. <br />Project builders depend on the City to tell them the right locations for buildings. <br />This is a sensitive issue because the Board has just spent a year developing a <br />clearer set of ordinances to enforce. He is not in favor of a 93% variance of the <br />ordinance which he believes would be as bad a precedent as the Council trying <br />to appease property owners with cost - sharing. <br />Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to deny the requested variance by the Sullivans <br />and was seconded by Mr. Gelbmann. The motion carried, 4 -2. Mr. Dunn and <br />Ms. Dahl opposed. <br />C. PUBLIC HEARING - MUSA Expansion on Lilac Avenue and Marvy Street <br />Chair Schaps declared the public hearing open at 7:08 p.m. <br />Ms. Wyland stated that the City has received two requests from two property <br />owners to amend the Metropolitan Urban Services Area (MUSA) Agreement to <br />allow City sewer and water services to their property as a result of septic system <br />failure. A petition has been received from six property owners on Lilac Street <br />requesting their properties be included in MUSA. One of the parcels with septic <br />system failure is located on Lilac Street, which has sewer and water lines. The <br />six properties are not currently located within MUSA and must be in order to be <br />allowed utility line connection. The Metropolitan Council has recommended <br />including the whole section rather than just the one property and has indicated <br />that there would be a favorable response to the addition of approximately 16.2 <br />