Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING <br />APRIL 13, 1994 <br />allow the developer time to modify his proposal. <br />Mr. Brixius briefly reviewed the history of this property and <br />explained that in 1981 the Comprehensive Plan indicated the <br />site as Rural and Expansion Residential. The 1987 <br />Comprehensive Plan amended the MUSA Boundaries and indicated <br />the property north of Holly and west of 12th Avenue as urban <br />residential. Beginning in 1989 through 1990 the City was <br />involved in a Comprehensive Plan amendment to enlarge the <br />City's MUSA. The area south of Holly Street was then brought <br />within the MUSA. Public hearings on this amendment were held <br />by the Council in July of '89 and December of '90. The plan <br />was reviewed by several advisory boards and the Council <br />officially closed the public hearing in December of 1990. The <br />Metro Council approved the plan in March of 1991 and the City <br />worked to fulfill the conditions of the Metro Council's <br />approval and formally adopted the Plan in June of 1992. In <br />August of 1992 the City amended the Zoning Map, after public <br />hearings, to reflect the new land use changes and Metro <br />Council recommendations that certain zoning districts be <br />eliminated. Finally, in February of 1994, the Council rezoned <br />the subject property from R -1 Residential to R -1X. The City <br />Attorney has reviewed the historical account of the property <br />in regards to the comprehensive plan revisions and rezonings <br />and has stated "that there has been no improper actions on <br />the part of the City under State Statute and local ordinances <br />and that the current zoning classification of R -1X is proper ". <br />John Landers stated that there is a question pertaining to the <br />rezoning of the property from Rural to R -1. He stated that he <br />had looked through the minute books from March of '87 through <br />'88 and found nothing relating to a change from Rural to R -1. <br />Tom Mesich stated that he thinks the P & Z has enough <br />direction indicating that the zoning was done properly. "I do <br />not think it is our place to insinuate that this was not the <br />case ". As far as the P & Z is concerned, we are working off <br />the Official Zoning Map and should not let this other issue <br />direct us. <br />Chairman Schaps stated that he agreed with Mr. Mesich. Map <br />rezoning is covered under State Statutes, we have asked the <br />staff for direction and received it, and the City Attorney has <br />advised that the zoning is legal. <br />CITIZEN COMMENT: <br />Sue Walseth, 1101 Holly Drive, stated that she has been a <br />resident for nine years and her comments are coming from her <br />heart. She feels that she is losing the use of her property <br />and will no longer fit in with the neighborhood. When the <br />property was changed from Rural to R -1 she did not receive a <br />notice and when her land was added to the MUSA, although she <br />objected, the designation was changed anyway. She was <br />originally told this plat would consist of 90 large lots. <br />