Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />May 11, 1994 <br />Andre will be trading a portion of the south /east corner of <br />his property for a portion of the north /west corner of the <br />Gubash property. This arrangement will eliminate the <br />encroachment of a storage building and driveway on Mr. Andre's <br />property. <br />After some discussion Ed Schones moved and was supported by Al <br />Robinson to approve the lot reconfiguration as presented. All <br />voted aye. Motion carried. <br />B. 94 -13 -P, Al Matheson, 7140 Sunset, Subdivision <br />Planning Coordinator Wyland advised the P & Z that Mr. <br />Matheson was in the process of selling a vacant lot adjoining <br />his property when it was determined that a portion of his two <br />existing out buildings were over the property line. To <br />correct this situation and facilitate the sale of the vacant <br />lot, Mr. Matheson is requesting a minor subdivision that would <br />take approximately 24.5 feet from Parcel A and add it to <br />Parcel B. Both lots would still be well within the <br />requirements of the Zoning Code for an R -1 District and <br />utilities are available to serve both lots (from Blaine). <br />Al Robinson made a motion recommending approval and was <br />• supported by John Landers. All voted aye. Motion carried. <br />• <br />C. 94 -11 -P, Trappers,Crossing, Continuation of Public Hearing <br />for Preliminary Plat <br />Planning Consultant Brixius stated that the developer has <br />responded to staff and P & Z concern by redesigning the <br />proposal to provide 124 building sites. The overall density <br />for the development is 1.7 units per acre. Mr. Brixius <br />indicated that the proposed layout responds to the site's <br />configuration and physical constraints in a positive manner. <br />There are 14.1 acres of wetland on the property and permits <br />have been obtained from the RCWD. Staff would recommend <br />approval of the preliminary plat subject to the conditions <br />outlined on page 2 of the Planner's report dated May 4, 1994. <br />Rick Gelbmann asked how flexible they could be in considering <br />a PDO. Mr. Brixius stated that the purpose of the PDO was to <br />provide flexibility, therefore, it is up to the P & Z's <br />discretion. It could be 90% of standard, or more flexible if <br />they so desire. He has suggested that the lots be kept to a <br />minimum of 85' in lot width which provides ample space for a <br />three car garage. Mr. Gelbmann also stated that the Board <br />should possibly consider cluster type developments to enhance <br />wetland areas. <br />2 <br />