Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Planning & Zoning Board Minutes <br />August 10, 1994 <br />July. You did not review the plat. The Planner called the <br />plat a composite, Corsan called it a concept, the agenda <br />called it a preliminary plat. What is a composite. Mr. Lyden <br />asked if the P & Z ever saw where a plat was approved by the <br />Council without the P & Z seeing it. Mr. Robinson indicated <br />that it had happened years ago. Mr. Lyden further indicated <br />that he believes there was a conscious effort to undermine the <br />policies, procedures and the due process and that the P & Z <br />was made to be a joke. The Council should find someone else <br />to do their dirty work. He is now going to go home and would <br />invite any of the members of the board to drop their paperwork <br />in the basket and follow him out. <br />Kathy Nordine asked for a point of clarification. If there is <br />a substantial change in a preliminary plat, they way I <br />interpret the Ordinance, its not really required to come back <br />to us - is that true. Planning Coordinator Wyland explained <br />that the original plat consisted of 124 lots, there was <br />discussion of a 104 lot plat and the Planner's recommendation <br />were used to make up the 118 lot plat - so there is a question <br />as to what a substantial change is - it went from 124 to 104 <br />to 118 to meet the Planners report - then, no it would not <br />have to come back to the P & Z. <br />John Landers stated that he felt the plat was a whole new <br />concept and is still asking for the PDO. He felt it should <br />have been sent back to the P & Z because the public was not <br />allowed to speak and therefore denied due process. I do not <br />feel it was a legal act. Kathy Nordine stated that the <br />Council does not hold the public hearing the P & Z does, <br />however, she too felt the public should be allowed to speak. <br />Mr. Schones asked how many lots did not conform to the R -1X <br />Standards. Ms. Wyland explained that she did not have the <br />exact number, however, the majority of the lots met the area <br />requirement with flexibility given on some for lot width. <br />Carolyn Dahl of Holly Court stated that she would like to <br />speak in regard to the P & Z minutes. As a member of the <br />Trappers Crossing neighborhood, she feels trapped. She stated <br />that she spoke at the Council Work Session regarding the <br />inaccuracy of the P & Z minutes. Excessive summarization <br />resulted in important statements being omitted. Staff has to <br />prepare a staff report, address the meeting and at the same <br />time take accurate notes. This is physically and mentally <br />impossible. You can not take accurate notes and talk at the <br />same time. What is needed is a recording secretary at each <br />and every meeting so that the staff can do the accurate, <br />precise presentation they are equipped to do without <br />interruptions. The City only has a record of what the City <br />Hall wants put in the minutes because tapes are recorded over <br />and over again. On 1/12/94 I stated three times I would <br />prefer R -1X to R -1 yet in the minutes it was typed that I <br />stated R -l. I also stated I wanted the property back to rural <br />and that was omitted. Others stated R -1X and it was omitted. <br />2 <br />