Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board Minutes <br />August 10, 1994 <br />• Mr. Powell explained that if necessary barriers could be <br />installed. Traffic is using the roadway. <br />• <br />• <br />After some discussion Tom Mesich made a MOTION recommending <br />approval of the Right -of -Way Plat with the recommendation that <br />the City Attorney expedite the proceedings, that the plat is <br />not filed until transfer of ownership has occurred and the <br />roadway be blocked off to all but construction traffic. Mr. <br />Schones seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried. <br />C. Behm's Century Farms, Rezoning <br />Planning Consultant Kermis reviewed this request and stated <br />that the P & Z had previously denied the rezoning and MUSA <br />Exchange on a 4 to 3 vote. The Council and P & Z subsequently <br />met and discussed the proposal with the suggestion from the <br />Council that this development may represent a logical growth <br />pattern for the City and requested that the P & Z outline <br />conditions under which the development will adhere to if the <br />Council chooses to approve the proposal. Mr. Kermis further <br />outlined conditions outlined in the August 5, 1994 Planner's <br />Report. They included the following: <br />1. The MUSA expansion to include Behms Century Farms be <br />done as part of a comprehensive City wide MUSA expansion, <br />not as a MUSA land trade. <br />2. The future plat must comply with R -1 minimum lot area, <br />width and depth standards. <br />3. The developer is responsible for the full cost of <br />utility extension bringing municipal sewer and water to <br />the site. <br />4. The plat design must provide sensitivity and <br />protection of the Lino Air Park runway to avoid future <br />land use complaints. <br />5. The developer pursue a variance for the Thomas Street <br />cul -de -sac length. <br />6. The developer submit a phasing plan that will outline <br />the staged development of the plat. <br />7. All grading, drainage, wetland mitigation be reviewed <br />and approved by RCWD. <br />8. Submission of development bylaws and deed covenants <br />that outline air park protection, home sizes, etc. <br />9. Submission of detailed landscape and tree preservation <br />plans that address screening at the periphery of the plat <br />and reduces the visual impact of the subdivision from <br />adjacent properties and the County road. <br />10. Compliance with Park Board recommendation with regard <br />to area park needs. <br />11. Development contract that outlines the terms of the <br />subdivision developments and includes financial <br />securities that insure performance. <br />Chairman Schaps advised those present that this was not a <br />Public Hearing. He also asked about the concerns of the air <br />park property owners and indicated that Mr. Uhde had stated <br />there would be a disclaimer on the properties assuring the <br />5 <br />