10/12/1994 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

PLANNING & ZONING BOARD October 12, 1994 III approximately 100 per year, but he noted he would work with the City. Ms. Nordine inquired as to what the developer would do, if he was not able to obtain the additional land desired. Mr. Emmrick indicated the land currently under contract would meet any critical mass requirements and cover any utility costs. Mr. Landers inquired as to the location of the sewer and water. Mr. Powell indicated it would be via a lift station to the force main on Cedar Street to the Forest Lake interceptor. The water source and storage would be located on the east of 35E with a trunk extension across 35E to the rest of the system. Mr. Landers inquired if the resident who do not wish to sell would be affected by the sewer and water development. Mr. Powell indicated it would have to be developed within the plat. Ms. Karen Cunningham, 2310 Cedar Street, explained her property would border the development. Ms. Cunningham's concern is the drainage, the surrounding wetlands, and a concern for the wildlife. She felt her way of life would be affected and opposes the development. Mr. Jim Keefe, 6300 Rolling Hills Drive, directly south of the second phase, indicated concerns of development located in the middle of large acreage, creating an island of development. Mr. Keefe indicated opposition to the development. Ed Schones made a MOTION to CONTINUE the public hearing until the November meeting and was supported by Rick Gelbmann. All voted aye. Motion carried. VI. DISCUSSION A. Michelle Whitney inquired as to the feasibility of a variance for an accessory building. Her property is located in a Neighborhood Business Zoning District and is considered a pre- existing non - conforming use. No structural alterations are allowed. Ms. Whitney indicated earlier she would like to construct an addition to her garage for a total of 960 square feet. The existing garage is 460 square feet. Planning Coordinator Wyland indicated this problem is not an unusual one, and Staff has discussed reviewing the issue. Mr. Landers inquired as to the size of surrounding lots. • Ms. Whitney noted the average size of the lots is one acre.