Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />November 9, 1994 <br />Mr. Schones stated that common sense dictates that we <br />move cautiously and wait. There has been a lot of <br />building, 20/20 Vision is in progress, and I think it is <br />prudent that we slow down. <br />Mesich, Landers, Gelbmann, and Schones voted iri favor. <br />Nordine, Robinson, and Schaps voted in apposition. <br />Motion carried. <br />John Landers made a MOTION recommending denial of <br />application for preliminary plat for Clearwater Creek and <br />was supported by Ed Schones. Landers, Mesich, Gelbmann <br />and Schones voted in favor. Nordine, Robinson and Schaps <br />voted in opposition. Motion carried. <br />A brief recess was taken at 9:06 p.m. <br />The meeting reconvened at 9:13 p.m. <br />VI. DISCUSSION: <br />A. Gary Uhde /Lino Air Park Discussion Item. Mr. Brixius <br />indicated at the last meeting a brief presentation was <br />given regarding the issue of the Lino Air Park. He <br />indicated one correction he would like the Board to note, <br />the lots sizes are not 1 acre, but average 30,000 square <br />feet, the average dimensions would be 120 feet x 260 <br />feet. <br />Mr. Brixius indicated he would like to see a P.D.O. used <br />only to provide flexibility for the hangers, regarding <br />oversized buildings. <br />Mr. John Johnson, Engineer for Mr. Uhde, indicated the <br />changes that would be made to the lots, nine lots would <br />be designed from seven currently platted lots along the <br />Air Park run -way. He indicated the actual net increase <br />of lots for the entire area would be between 5 -10 lots. <br />He also indicated Thomas Avenue would not be extended. <br />Mr. Johnson requested guidance from the Board regarding <br />the preliminary plat and P.D.O. <br />Mr. Brixius indicated the process would consist of two <br />stages, 1) a revised plat and 2) P.D.O. <br />Discussion was held regarding the Board's concerns. <br />Chairman Schaps indicated a general feeling of the board <br />would be to approve the project, although there was <br />concern that the property was not currently in the MUSA. <br />B. Non - conforming Use Ordinance Revision, was tabled <br />until the next meeting. <br />8 <br />