Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MAY 13, 1992 <br />III.B 92- 10 &11, Site Plan Review & Variance for T. Turcotte, Outlot <br />A, Otter Lake Estates. <br />City Engineer Schneider reviewed this request which is to allow <br />construction on Outlot A, Otter Lake Estates, of a single family <br />residence, grant a variance for lot width (180' required in an SR -X <br />Zoning District), and grant a variance for the private use of <br />public right of way. Mr. Schneider also reviewed the history of <br />the site which was platted in 1977 with the dedicated Channel Drive <br />for future subdivision of Outlots A & B. Staff recommended <br />approval of the request with the condition that a Driveway <br />Agreement be drafted by the City Attorney for use of Channel Drive. <br />RCWD will be reviewing this item at their May 27th meeting. <br />Monika Slatten asked if the adjoining property owners had been <br />notified of this request and was advised that they were not and <br />that the City is not required to provide such notification in this <br />case. Planning members were also advised that this request was <br />reducing the originally proposed density. Kathleen Nordine asked <br />if the property owner(s) intended to subdivide their property in <br />the future and was advised that they did not (Both Turcotte and <br />Olson) . <br />MOTION: Al Robinson moved and was supported by Tom Mesich to <br />approve the request as submitted with the condition that a Driveway <br />Agreement as drafted by the City Attorney be properly executed and <br />that the Fire Chief have an opportunity to review and comment on <br />the proposed construction and driveway alignment and that the <br />request meet with the approval of the Rice Creek Watershed <br />District. All voted aye. Motion carried. <br />III.C. 92 -12 &13 Site Plan Review - Variance for R. Olson, Outlot B <br />Otter Lake Estates <br />City Engineer Schneider explained that this request is similar to <br />the Turcotte request and requires the same variances for lot <br />frontage in an SR -X Zoning District and for the private use of <br />public right -of -way. Note: A variance for lot area is not <br />necessary as this property is a lot of record. <br />MOTION: Kathleen Nordine moved and was supported by Thomas Mesich <br />to approve the request as submitted with the condition that a <br />Driveway Agreement as drafted by the City Attorney be property <br />executed and that the Fire Chief have an opportunity to review and <br />comment on the proposed construction and driveway alignment and <br />that the request meet with the approval of the Rice Creek Watershed <br />District. All voted aye. Motion carried. <br />