My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/09/1992 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1992
>
12/09/1992 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2014 12:53:13 PM
Creation date
7/17/2014 10:34:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
12/09/1992
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Planning & Zoning Board <br />December 9, 1992 <br />• <br />• <br />Ordinance can be meet. He indicated that he has an <br />agreement with the property owners to remove the signs <br />within 90 days of development of either site. These <br />particular applications have been submitted three times <br />since 1988 - the previous two times the requests were <br />denied because of studies being conducted and /or possible <br />developments occurring in the vicinity. Adams would just <br />like to put the signs up until development occurs. <br />Mr. Tom Schutte, representing the owner of the 34 acre <br />parcel north of the I -35E site was present to voice <br />concern about the proposed request. He indicated that <br />the piece of property the sign will be located on is <br />approximately 1 3/4 acres in size and marginal in terms <br />of development possibility (mostly wetland) - therefore, <br />the potential is there that the sign will never be <br />removed because the property will never be developed. He <br />added that this sign location could affect development of <br />his larger parcel to the north. <br />Tom Mesich stated that if the I -35E property is not <br />developable, we do not want to locate a sign on this site <br />with no option for removal. <br />After some discussion Kathleen Nordine made a motion <br />denying Conditional Use Permit 92 -50 and 92 -51 based on <br />the recommendation in the Land Use Study for the <br />Interchange Areas /Comprehensive Plan and comments <br />outlined in the staff report and also the question as to <br />whether the I -35E site is, indeed, a buildable site. <br />Monica Slatten seconded the motion. All voted aye. <br />Motion carried to deny requests as submitted. <br />B. Shores of Marshan Lake, Relocation of Recreation Trail <br />Mary Kay Wyland explained that the developer is asking <br />the City to approve the relocation of the platted <br />recreation trail. The staff and Park Board have reviewed <br />the request and after much discussion developed three <br />options outlined in the staff report. The Park Board and <br />staff concurred on Option 1 which was to have the City <br />pursue a Corps of Engineers permit for the relocated <br />trail on the lake side - on the approximate "oxcart <br />trail" location closer to the lake than presently <br />platted, with the developer financing the costs and with <br />the City working with Braurer and Associates on obtaining <br />the permit. Option 2 as recommended by the Staff was to <br />have the trail remain as platted (this was Option 3 of <br />the Park Board) , and Option 3 as recommended by the Staff <br />was to relocated the trail just off the street row on <br />lots 8 -12 with connections to a lake side trail between <br />Lots 12 & 13 and Lots 7 & 8 (this was Option 2 as <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.