02/14/1990 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD February 14, 1990 1. On June 23rd sewer and water stubs were placed for two lots on the west side of Heider's property. None were placed on the south side of the lot. 2. On August 4th curb and gutter was placed on the west side of Heider's lot. Two curb cuts were made. 3. Paving of Second Avenue - the street on the west side of Heider's property was completed on August 24th. 4. (Again) policy for these lot splits was determined at the Planning and Zoning Board on October llth. The zoning ordinance requires corner lots to be 105 feet wide. With the Heider application the corner lot is only 85 feet wide and a variance would be required before the title to the lot could be recorded. MOTION: Robert King moved to recommend to the city council a lot split for Paul Heider for Lot 1, Block 3 of Ulmer's Rice Lake Addition as shown in Application #90 -01. Al . Robinson seconded the motion and the motion was approved unanimously. Variance MOTION: Al Robinson moved to recommend to the city council approval of a variance for Paul Heider permitting a corner lot on Parcel B on the certificate of survey with 85 feet of width as shown in Application #90 -07 due to the fact that it meets the six findings of fact and also due to the fact that utilities are already installed. Robert King seconded the motion and the motion was approved unanimously. MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR DENNIS A. SMITH, APPLICATION #90 -04, AND VARIANCE, 90 -05. The Design Review Board reviewed a concept plan for Mr. Smith previously. The proposed minor subdivision is identical to the sketch plan. There is also a proposed frontage variance from the 180 feet requirement to 160 feet. In Mr. Boxrud's review of this proposal he discovered that the subdivision code indicates that a minor subdivision is defined as "a subdivision involving the creating of four or fewer parcels, tracts, or lots, and not involving the creation of a new street or easement ". Strict interpretation of this definition may indicate that a minor subdivision would not be allowed in this instance. • Dan Boxrud spoke with Bill Hawkins, City Attorney, and he informed Dan that even though this is part of the definition, this language does not appear in the city's ordinance book. The intent of the applicant is to create only two lots and Page 2